Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yankees Deny Rumors That Team Is For Sale

What Howard/Paul to the Lakers Looks Like.


First what makes me think this at all Possible:


 Ken Berger of CBSSports.com:

Of the teams [Dwight] Howard is likely to consider when exercising his early-termination option after next season — sources say the Lakers, Knicks and Nets are the strong favorites — L.A. is the one with the most attractive trade assets. The massive contracts attached to the Lakers’ most desirable players also puts them in the rare position of being able to absorb either[Gilbert] Arenas or [Hedo] Turkoglu as a way to soften the blow for Orlando. [...]

 J.A. Adande of ESPN.com:

"One person told me Howard wants to be a Laker. Someone else said he wants Chris Paul to join him in Orlando. Another said his top priority is to sign a maximum contract, which would make a trade (either in-season or a summer 2012 sign-and-trade) the only way for him to land in Los Angeles."

 

Putting this together in a trade that makes sense for every team involved? Good luck, but under a couple of admittedly unlikely scenarios there is a perfect storm that makes my intriguing headline seem a little more sensible.

Star-divide

First, Chris Paul has to say he wants out of New Orleans. This isn't a huge stretch, he's done it before but as we wind down toward the end of his contract his ability to leverage that fact might increase the likelihood he could force a trade.

Second, Dwight Howard needs to want out of Orlando. I'm not sure of this yet, like at all. Howard is a unique guy, and it seems he does enjoy the pull he has in Orlando, the New Arena built for him etc. But This scenario has been speculated by more rational people than I'm sure you think me to be.

Third, The New Orleans Hornets have to be ok with a team that sells tickets but is not necessarily built to win. You're not going to get a better center cog back than Paul and since the NBA owns the Hornets I think re-building the team to a high attendance and thus high profit franchise with a payroll lower than they currently would be satisfactory for its owners(the nba.) Conspiracy theories abound, but I don't think its wrong for the NBA to make a smart business move that would 1) Make the Lakers near locks for the Finals every year(netting overall profit for the NBA) 2) improve the profitability of the team they own.

Fourth, Kobe has a no trade clause. He can Veto this trade. My bet is his pride doesn't let him. But as I said earlier, the likelihood of this happening is not large. These are chance scenarios that when applied together makes for an extremely unlikely chance.

BUT

Here's the trade that makes it all happen and keeps each franchise happy under the conditions listed above:

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=3bb5app

If you don't wanna mozy of to espn here's the trade:

Magic- Lose: Howard(Laker,) Arenas (Laker,) Bass(New Orleans)

Get: Bynum, Gasol, Fisher

Why for the Magic? This trade almost makes sense even if Howard doesn't want out. Bass goes to New Orleans since we have Gasol at the Forward. We get rid of the immovable object that is Gil's contract by packaging him with Howard and get back Bynum and Gasol. The trade generally breaks down as Gasol, Bynum and Arenas Cap relief in exchange for Howard. This to me is fair value for Howard. And the Magic would have a team that would go at least as far as the one this year did- with the added benefit of cap room once these contracts go if not extended.

New Orleans- Lose: Chis Paul(Laker,) Jarret Jack(Laker,) Emeka Okafor(Laker,)

Get: Kobe Bryant, Steve Blake, Brandon Bass, Derrick Character

Why for the Hornets? The Hornets would still have a team that sells since it has Kobe Bryant in the starting lineup. They also get Blake to come in as their starting or back up pg to soften losing Paul. Blake, Bryant, Ariza, Bass, Random Defensive Center  is not built to win Championships. But it is a team built to happily allow Bryant 40 shots a night while defending well. Probably around an 8th seed, where the hornets are now, but selling way more tickets.

**Why for Kobe: Kobe can Veto this trade. But Bryant has his rings, going to a team where he can go back to being Kobe the way Derrick Rose is being Rose right now for the for bulls, for him must be somewhat appealing. Additionally I think Kobe would have enough pride(read arrogance) to think he could pull it off. For the record books, spending the last 4 seasons on a team where you are the only offensive options bodes really well for Kobe.

Lakers- Lose: Kobe Bryant, Derrick Fisher, Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum, Derek Character, Steve Blake

Get: Chris Paul, Dwight Howard, Jerret Jack, Emeka Okafor, Gilbert Arenas

Why for the Lakers? For starters, Kobe's Contract is 24 million a year. Kobe has declined a ton, despite the blathering of millions including himself that say he hasn't. At his price, I don't see how the lakers free the cap room to build a contender. He's simply not worth that amount of money to a team that is trying to build for a Championship. It works out as sending away the cost of Kobe Bryant, for the cost of Arenas and Okafor. This seems like a horrible Idea, but it is the absorption of these 2 contracts that allow the lakers to put Chris Paul and Dwight Howard on the same team. And they'll be favorites the second they are, make no mistake about it.

Addtionally, their lineup would like this:

Chris Paul/Arenas

Jarret Jack/Shannon Brown

Artest/Walton/Barnes

Odom/Okafor

Howard/Okafor/Odom

I don't consider myself an expert, but I think most people would agree that team is nearly the best defensive and offensive team in the league at the same time. Everyone in the league would once again be re-tooling to deal with the lakers, who once again are bigger than everyone else, with the best guard in the league on the wings.

This FanPost was made by a member of the Orlando Pinstriped Post community, and is to be treated as the opinions and views of its author, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Kobe is not leaving LA to go to NAWLEANS

Awesome, the Christian in Christian Dior
Damn they don't make 'em like this anymore
I ask ?cause I'm not sure
Do anybody make real s**t anymore?

by 4QB on May 11, 2011 1:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Nor are we going to get destroyed by a trade like that

Awesome, the Christian in Christian Dior
Damn they don't make 'em like this anymore
I ask ?cause I'm not sure
Do anybody make real s**t anymore?

by 4QB on May 11, 2011 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

How is getting Gasol and Bynum for Howard any worse than the best case trade Orlando could pull off for him? AND they get rid of Arenas. Its a win for the magic, and a team just as good as this year.

by D to the P on May 11, 2011 2:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gasol is old, Bynum is injury prone and not even close to the same level as D12. Arenas's contract is the only good thing that comes out of that trade

Awesome, the Christian in Christian Dior
Damn they don't make 'em like this anymore
I ask ?cause I'm not sure
Do anybody make real s**t anymore?

by 4QB on May 11, 2011 3:23 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with everything you said. And I still think its the best possible deal the trade market could do. And there would be no horrible season or time necessary to rebuild.

Nelson
Richardson
Clark(I guess turk.. whatever I apparently Overvalue defense way too much.)
Gasol
Bynum

That team goes just as far as the team did this year, except it doesn’t have Gil’s contract anymore and has a tradeable piece in Gasol Or Bynum, whichever doesn’t work out and depending on what comes up on the trade market.

by D to the P on May 11, 2011 3:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

This one time the Lakers got rid of Shaq for a noisy young guard.

by D to the P on May 11, 2011 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

My point is Shaq had done more in his career at that point than Kobe had, but they let Shaq go.

I don’t suspect the lakers would value sentimental relationships more than they Value being in the finals. And even a bystander would make the suggestion that trading Kobe’s 24 million dollar contract for a more productive younger and best guard in the league in CP3 and reasonable in line.

More over: do you see the squad the Lakers end up with? The only team in the league that even compares is the Heat, and even there I think Riley would trade his line-up for that one.

And like I say in my post, I don’t think this scenario is likely. In fact I think the 4 conditions I require are unlikely in their own right, and combined as likely as Gortat getting MVP next year. It’s simply an “If the stars aligned” type post.

by D to the P on May 11, 2011 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dude, KOBE IS THEIR FRANCHISE.

Awesome, the Christian in Christian Dior
Damn they don't make 'em like this anymore
I ask ?cause I'm not sure
Do anybody make real s**t anymore?

by 4QB on May 11, 2011 3:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

So was shaq.

It is your position than sentiments matter more than rings to the lakers?

by D to the P on May 11, 2011 3:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

bahahahahha!

Never been afraid to say what's on my mind at any given time of day. Renegade.
http://www.twitter.com/JShannonhouse3
http://www.twitter.com/Amway_Get_Loud

by JeffShann3 on May 11, 2011 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just got a new line for my sig.

Never been afraid to say what's on my mind at any given time of day. Renegade.
Evan: "David Polega. Banned."

http://www.twitter.com/JShannonhouse3
http://www.twitter.com/Amway_Get_Loud

by JeffShann3 on May 11, 2011 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ripoff'd

Awesome, the Christian in Christian Dior
Damn they don't make 'em like this anymore
I ask ?cause I'm not sure
Do anybody make real s**t anymore?

by 4QB on May 11, 2011 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

LULZ

Awesome, the Christian in Christian Dior
Damn they don't make 'em like this anymore
I ask ?cause I'm not sure
Do anybody make real s**t anymore?

by 4QB on May 11, 2011 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

trollolololololol

Otis Smith, what you've just done is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard of. At no point in your rambling, incoherent trades were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this blog is now dumber for having witnessed it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

by MoveThoseChains on May 11, 2011 12:49 PM EDT reply actions  

lol

you posting your wacky trade here too?

Jason Terry just hit another 3.
twitter

by shaqfor3 on May 11, 2011 2:31 PM EDT reply actions  

FYI.................

Kobe and Dirk Nowitzki are the only players in the NBA with “no trade” clause in their contracts, and by the way the only thing that make sense in your post is that Orlando definitely need get rip of Gil’s contract.

by roger40 on May 11, 2011 10:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Vstan_small
Rocket Plan
Small
Otis Smith, a fair comprehensive trial of all his trades.
Vstan_small
2012 NBA Draft Primer (★Magic Edition★)

Recent FanPosts

Small
3 team trade (ORL, HOU, LAL
Small
Please not again...
Images_small
Dwightdreams: Superteam or Traditional Team
Small
Rumor - Dwight to Miami for Bosch/Wade
Avatar_small
Sign an Extension or be Traded ... Fallacy or Simplicity?
Small
IF you could build your own team? MR/MRS. GM
Small
Would this be a Beast in the East or not?
Images_small
Ryan Anderson: To Re-sign or Not

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Contact Us

General Twitter feed

Evan Dunlap, Managing Editor / Press Contact

Tiny Blogroll

Rather than include our complete blogroll in this space, we've decided to link to it instead. That way, you won't have to do as much scrolling. Enjoy.


Managing Editor

Minimalistchalksquare_small Evan Dunlap

Contributing Writer

Chicago_white_sox-logo-945af4da0a-seeklogo Mike from Illinois