Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Projects: Andre Holmes

Game 1: Was it really all about the jumpshots?

This matchup worried me more than any other potential matchup in the east.  I picked the Magic to win in 6, but knew it would be tough. Watching the game, it seemed my fears were correct.

It also seemed that the Hawks made jump shots and the Magic didn't. Of course, sometimes, the way things "seem" isn't really how they are and this article inspired me to do more research to find out what really happened. Box scores don't give nearly enough info, but fortunately HoopData does.

At the Rim

At the rim, the Magic were above their season shooting percentage and number of attempts while the Hawks were below their averages in attempts and percentage. Given the big man lineups for both teams, this is not really a surprise. If the attempts in this game for both teams connected at their season average, Atlanta would have netted 3.5 more points here.

3 to 9 Feet

On shots from 3 to 9 feet from the hoop, again the Magic were above their averages in attempts and percentage. However, the Hawks had 1 less attempt at this range than normal but made 2.3 more than usual shooting 70% (7-10) compared to their season average of 43% from this distance. If shot at season averages, Orlando nets an additional 2.3 points here.

10 to 15 Feet

At 10 to 15 feet, the Magic shot fewer shots than normal but at a slightly higher percentage while the Hawks shot slightly more at a lower percentage. However, the numbers were so close, that shooting season averages would have netted only an additional 0.3 points for Orlando.

So, from the rim to 15 feet from the basket, the difference between what was shot and what would be expected on the scoreboard given the attempts is off by less than 1 point (0.855 points to be exact). Given the lower overall variance on shots closer to the rim, this isn't surprising, but it's good to know that Dwight's monster game did not overly skew an advantage for the Magic in this area that is unlikely to be duplicated in future games.

However, above 16 feet is where it gets really interesting.

16 to 23 Feet

At 16-23 feet, the Magic generally make 5.9 baskets on 14.7 attempts for 40.1%. However, in this game they shot just 10 attempts in this area and made only 2! That's right, 20% shooting on long 2s. The Hawks meanwhile shot more than usual from this range - which is actually what the Magic want - but connected at above their average and just shy of 50%. If both teams hit their season averages on these attempts in this game, the Magic gain 6.69 points here.

3-point Shots

Beyond the 3 point arc, the Magic shot 3.6 fewer attempts than normal and hit at ~10% less. Meanwhile, the Hawks also shot 3.4 fewer shots from here but made ~8% more. Shooting at expected percentages, the Magic would gain a whopping 9.51 points here - essentially the difference in the game.

To put it much more briefly, it really was about the jump shots. If both teams shoot their season averages on every attempt in this game, the Magic gain an additional 15.34 points - and all of them on shots from beyond 16 feet.

As a Magic fan, this should be comforting information. While it is certainly possible for teams to stay hot or cold for multiple games, the 7-game-series format of the NBA playoffs should help dampen these kinds of anomalies over the long haul. Additionally, seeing that all of the points came in the areas with the highest variance in outcome further strengthens an expectation for regression to the mean for both teams in future games.

This FanPost was made by a member of the Orlando Pinstriped Post community, and is to be treated as the opinions and views of its author, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

Comment 21 comments  |  10 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great post!

Thanks for taking the time to do this, helps calm my nerves heading into tuesday.

by RememberTmac on Apr 18, 2011 5:35 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Awesome. Rec'd.

Otis Smith, what you've just done is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard of. At no point in your rambling, incoherent trades were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this blog is now dumber for having witnessed it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

by MoveThoseChains on Apr 18, 2011 5:58 PM EDT reply actions  

This is good stuff.

However, I would’ve liked to have seen the numbers comparing our season averages this year to the season series against the Hawks. I do know they severely limited us in 3-point production every game, so the 3-point production is not too anomalous.

"We just want to chill" - Chris Bosh.
Proud Jameer and Rashard apologist since '07

by slickw143 on Apr 18, 2011 7:33 PM EDT reply actions  

I had intended to do that, but I was already wasting too much time at work.

Actually, the other problem is figuring out what games should be included.

I have all of the data and can plug it into the spreadsheet, but the first game was with the “old” team and the 2nd game was the day of the trades. I’d have to refresh my mind on the others to see if they had any asterisks as well (i.e. was Bibby traded yet?). At that point, is the sample size starting to dwindle too much?

I may see if I can throw something together this afternoon, though.

The plural of "anecdote" isn't "data."

by EnnBee on Apr 19, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

You're right in regards to the games and wondering if they should matter.

I think the only reason they should is because the 3-point trend carried through each game, so I think it has more to do with ATL’s roster and gameplan than it does ours. They’ve just been very good at contesting our 3’s and staying home or rotating out.

"We just want to chill" - Chris Bosh.
Proud Jameer and Rashard apologist since '07

by slickw143 on Apr 19, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great job, rec'd

I was wondering the same thing watching the game; I felt Atlanta was really making 2pt jumpers and that was it. Here are some other numbers I noticed:

-Atlanta was 15/25 in the paint (I just went to the box score and checked the shot locations) for 60%. Like you said they were hitting ridiculous number of 2pt jumpers.

-18 turnovers is a real, real bad number. In the 8 playoff games played this weekend, this was the highest. Since Atlanta had only 9, the Magic doubled the turnover ratio which no other team did either.

I’m a little more hopeful looking at the numbers, but the fact is they lost Game 1 at home against (in my eyes) an inferior opponent. Especially since they played so well against Chicago last week, the “stand there and watch Dwight” offense doesn’t seem to be the most effective for the future. Wait and see, i guess.

"A man has got to have a code." -Bunk, Season 1; Omar, Season 4.

by L Magico on Apr 18, 2011 7:49 PM EDT reply actions  

According to Van Gundy, they only hit 8 layups - and that sounds about right

As for turnovers, I believe 5 of them were 3 second calls on Dwight. On 3 of those (1st, 4th, and 5th, I think), I instantly rolled my Tivo back and checked with a stop watch. In none of those cases had he been in the lane even 2.5 seconds. I didn’t think to check the other 2 when they happened.

I know 3 seconds is a rule and should be enforced on BOTH ends. Just like cops usually give you a few MPH buffer on the freeway, it is generally enforced on the more conservative side with players being allowed an extra .5 seconds (at least) before the whistle ever sounds. As such, it is even MORE glaring when it is called erroneously tight multiple times on a single player.

I just wish I was surprised by it.

The plural of "anecdote" isn't "data."

by EnnBee on Apr 19, 2011 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's upsetting stuff.

"We just want to chill" - Chris Bosh.
Proud Jameer and Rashard apologist since '07

by slickw143 on Apr 19, 2011 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

thanks for the analysis.

Unfortunately, I am with you on the wishing I could be surprised, but of course we’re not.

The NBA says my avatar is not a flagrant foul. When Howard fouls players like this he gets T'd up.
http://www.twitter.com/JShannonhouse3
http://www.twitter.com/Amway_Get_Loud

by JeffShann3 on Apr 19, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

So true, we would’ve won if we shot our season average and so did Atlanta. Hoping things are different in game 2.

by normajean on Apr 18, 2011 9:00 PM EDT reply actions  

My only criticism

Is that season averages will take into account all the times Dwight was genuinely double teamed, leading to much more open, and makeable, jump shots for Orlando players. Accounting for the effect of a genuine stay at home defense is probably not something that can be expected, however.

Good post. Hopefully the Magic can hit some shots and the Hawks will miss some.

by eltharion_doa on Apr 19, 2011 2:31 AM EDT reply actions  

This is absolutely true

But I don’t really know of a way to account for that.

Also, I do think there were a number of shots (like all of Bass’s jumpers in that range where the team went 2 for 10) that were open shots that just bricked. Same with a number of open 3s. The single coverage may have made a difference, but guys had plenty of good looks. They just didn’t drop.

But more than the offense, 93 points should be enough to beat the Hawks. If they continue shooting 70% at 9 feet and 50% out to 23 feet, it’s going to take some pretty hot shooting for the guys in blue to have a shot no matter what.

The plural of "anecdote" isn't "data."

by EnnBee on Apr 19, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Recommended... nice job on the research

If the Atlanta guard trio of Johnson, Hinrich, and Crawford combine to shoot over 50% from the field again, I’ll be very much surprised.

Chicago Bears... 2010 NFC Conference runners-up
Chicago Blackhawks... 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Champions
Orlando Magic... 2009 Eastern Conference Champions

by Mike from Illinois on Apr 19, 2011 4:12 AM EDT reply actions  

It almost doesn't

I was doing some work putting together graphs of shooting for the previous games yesterday but it got too depressing to finish it.

The plural of "anecdote" isn't "data."

by EnnBee on Apr 26, 2011 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Vstan_small
Rocket Plan
Small
Otis Smith, a fair comprehensive trial of all his trades.
Vstan_small
2012 NBA Draft Primer (★Magic Edition★)

Recent FanPosts

Small
3 team trade (ORL, HOU, LAL
Small
Please not again...
Images_small
Dwightdreams: Superteam or Traditional Team
Small
Rumor - Dwight to Miami for Bosch/Wade
Avatar_small
Sign an Extension or be Traded ... Fallacy or Simplicity?
Small
IF you could build your own team? MR/MRS. GM
Small
Would this be a Beast in the East or not?
Images_small
Ryan Anderson: To Re-sign or Not

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Contact Us

General Twitter feed

Evan Dunlap, Managing Editor / Press Contact

Tiny Blogroll

Rather than include our complete blogroll in this space, we've decided to link to it instead. That way, you won't have to do as much scrolling. Enjoy.


Managing Editor

Minimalistchalksquare_small Evan Dunlap

Contributing Writer

Chicago_white_sox-logo-945af4da0a-seeklogo Mike from Illinois