Who Should the Orlando Magic Designate as Their Defensive Stopper?
Since the Orlando Magic traded Mickael Pietrus to the Phoenix Suns, the team's fans have wondered, in the comments sections of this website and elsewhere, to whom the team will turn for one-on-one perimeter defense. Dwight Howard, the two-time Defensive Player of the Year, anchors the pivot and can shut down entire offensive sets almost entirely by himself, as Gian Casimiro pointed out yesterday. But Howard can't contain the likes of LeBron James, Paul Pierce, Carmelo Anthony, and Joe Johnson on an individual level. This season, he's already called out his perimeter teammates to give a better effort on that end.
So, where indeed will the Magic turn? Of late, coach Stan Van Gundy has deployed 6-foot-10 combo forward Earl Clark, obtained from Phoenix in the trade involving Pietrus, in that role. In the last week, the second-year man has guarded Kevin Durant, Amar'e Stoudemire, and Carmelo Anthony for some stretches; those players rank first, third, and fifth, respectively, in the league in scoring. And Van Gundy's glowed about Clark's potential to the media. Via Josh Robbins of the Orlando Sentinel:
"But I think his potential as a defensive player and as a defensive impact guy is unlimited if he can get down some better team defensive principles and focus and if he can truly understand that his route to being a special player in this league lies at the defensive end."
That level of praise from Van Gundy, who prizes defense above all other facets of the game, isn't to be taken lightly.
However, Clark isn't the only candidate for the role of wing stopper. Orlando signed Quentin Richardson this summer in order to space the floor offensively but, more importantly, to provide the sort of tough, physical defense against high-scoring opponents that can throw them off their game.
The arrival of Hedo Turkoglu and Jason Richardson from Phoenix bumped Richardson out of the rotation, but he vowed to stay positive and ready when I spoke to him about the trades a few months ago. He's done just that, and helped bottle up Anthony in the second half of the Magic's come-from-behind win against the New York Knicks on Wednesday. His effort didn't go unnoticed. Here's Van Gundy again, via Robbins:
"He can help us. He’s so competitive," Van Gundy said. "I think we can use his fire and competitiveness, so we want him ready to go."
Richardson's biggest issue this season--apart from, in general, not being a better player than Turkoglu, Jason Richardson, or J.J. Redick--is his offense. At 29.1 percent, his three-point shot has eluded him, and he's taken nearly 60 percent of his shots from beyond the arc. Because he doesn't handle the ball much or create for himself off the dribble, he's hard to keep on the floor unless he's making threes.
And yet. At 6-foot-6 and 227 pounds, he's a better physical match for most high-scoring small forwards than Clark, who's more better equipped to handle more stationary players. In playing either Clark or Richardson, Van Gundy has to weigh the cost of diminished offense against the potential benefit of better defense.
Let's assume Van Gundy finds room in his rotation for only one player for the rest of the season and the playoffs, with the one he doesn't choose only getting spot minutes. On which player would you want him to rely for perimeter defense?
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Against your taller guys Clark is the guy
but as we saw against guys like Carmelo we need a stronger defender like Q
Give me Q
with increased playing time I believe he’ll shoot closer to his career numbers. Seeing those 2 airballs from earl in the NY game was hideous. I don’t think I’ve seen Earl make one long range shot since coming to Orlando. Love his future potential, but for this year, it’s gotta be Q.
Orlando Magic. Oregon Ducks. Seattle Mariners. Jacksonville Jaguars.
Just by looking at the Eastern Conference playoff race
Paul Pierce, Lebron, Deng, Joe Johnson, Melo – all these guys seem more suitable to be guarded by Q than Earl, just going by recent performances. But who knows, Earl’s growing at such a rate he could be our man by then
It's got to be by matchup, but Q more often than Clark.
If you’re trying to contain a PF, then go with Clark. If you’re trying to contain a SF or SG, then Q is a better choice. Q is clearly a better player right now.
The biggest hope would be if Q can find his 3-pt stroke again. If he gets his %s up to his career levels again, you could probably get them both on the floor at the same time. Maybe slide Q over to SG, and try Nelson/Q-Rich/Hedo/Clark/Howard. Again…only if Q starts being a deep shot threat again.
by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Mar 3, 2011 7:27 AM EST reply actions
Q
It does depend on matchups, so that really is the answer. However, if we’re going with only one of the two guys for the remainder of the season, I say Q-Rich.
He’s a proven competitor who should get a few veteran calls on defensive assignments. Do we really think Earl Clark is going to get any respect against Melo, Pierce, or LeBron? Clark has the tools, but he’s way too green to rely on this season—assuming we’re just picking one guy to ride with.
Obviously, he’ll need to get his 3-ball back. Though I seem to remember him being very effective in the post in the pre-season. I’d like to see him get a bit of that back.
I like Earl at PF
Earl at PF means going against Bosh and Q/Hedo on Lebron. If we had J Rich or JJ at SG, and Dwight in the game as well, I think the lack of offense from Q and Earl would be ok due to the other guys on the floor.
I also think Q will knock down the open looks that he will get like he did against NYK.
Reading my posts is a privilege and I will ban anyone who disagrees with me from the Internet for life.
I'll take Q.
But I still think of Earl as a combo forward, so the matchup-dependant option leading the poll is just because of Earl’s ability to guard the 4, in my opinion. In the playoffs, our team will be needing to stop nearly everyone’s small forward, aside from Chicago, but even then Deng is a sneaky scorer. Q is a 40% career shooter from 3, put it this way, I’d rather have him launching out there until he gets warm than Arenas. At least we know Q can be efficient at his best, Arenas has always just been marginal from distance. Clark’s offensive skills are so raw and he’s fearless on that end, so it does result in plenty of mistakes, which would not work in playoff time. I like his fearlessness and am beginning to see the flashes of his ball handling and court vision that initially got him compared to Odom but he has a ways to go with his control on the drive. He’s got tenacity on both ends, though, I am sure both will get playing time in the postseason, but Q’s veteran wisdom, propensity to drill big 3’s and just an overall better matchup for the Lebron/Pierce/‘Melo/Bryant/Durant’s of the world…and yes, we need to be thinking that far in advance. This team can beat anyone, glad to see Q-Rich given a chance to show his effectiveness on a big stage, I think he earned his postseason crack at playing time that night against New York alone.
Earl has above average lateral quickness for his size
but he has alot of growing up to do still. Let’s keep in mind he’s already put on 10 lbs of muscle since his move from Phoenix and will become more comfortable with that in time. I think he’s going to be a very special player and probably the only player on our team that is capable of slowing down Durant due to his length.
I refuse to vote because Malik Allen is not listed as one of the choices.
He’s a true stopper, yo.
I guess that's the way the whole durned human comedy keeps perpetuatin' itself.
Absolutely has to be whatever is a better matchup.
You won’t play Q on Durant just like you won’t play Clark on Kobe/Melo/Wade. I think both Q and Clark might get a shot at Lebron though tonight, just to see what happens (playoff implications)
Im down with OPP, yeah you know me!
http://www.twitter.com/JShannonhouse3
http://www.twitter.com/Amway_Get_Loud

by 












