Orlando Magic Free-Agent Point Guard Primer, Part One: Unrestricted Targets
In his post-NBA Draft media availability session, Orlando Magic GM Otis Smith twice mentioned that one of the roster needs he will address via free agency is a backup point guard for starter Jameer Nelson. In anticipation of the free-agency negotiating period, which starts Thursday, I thought it'd make sense to look over some of the unrestricted veterans--that is, players whose teams cannot retain their services simply by matching their offer sheet--point guards who might be available. These players are, alphabetically, Steve Blake, Chris Duhon, Luke Ridnour, and Earl Watson. We'll take a look at some of the restricted options a bit later on.
And no, none of those guys can put the Magic over the top. That's not the idea here. This is a player who will ideally only log 15 minutes a night behind Nelson, and do so without undermining the team's chances. To use a baseball analogy, Smith doesn't need to hit a home run with this signing; he merely needs to reach base, and if that means an infield it, that's OK.
The ideal point guard in the Magic's offense can accomplish the following tasks, listed in no particular order:
Run the pick-and-roll efficiently;
shoot the three-pointer;
create his own shot;
and take care of the ball.
Youth and the ability to defend are important factors to consider as well.
I've included jump-cuts to make navigating the behemoth of a post a bit easier.
Steve Blake | Chris Duhon | Luke Ridnour | Earl Watson
Steve Blake
Blake's a rare sort of NBA journeyman: he's played for 5 different teams in 7 seasons, including two stints with Portland, yet he's started nearly 60% of the games in which he's appeared. You'd think a guy with as many different stops in his relatively brief career would be a full-time backup, but you'd be wrong, at least so far. Blake is transitioning into that stage of his career, though. He split last season between Portland and the L.A. Clippers, to whom the Trail Blazers sent him in exchange for Marcus Camby. The statistics used in this post reflect his time in Portland last year, because that's where he played most of his minutes.
In the pick-and-roll, Blake doesn't fare so well, producing 0.657 points per possession when he calls his own number--which is mercifully just 36.3% of the time he runs it--according to Synergy Sports Technology. It's easy to understand why: his limited athleticism and creativity means he's hardly able to get all the way to the basket; not once, in the 70 possessions he ran the pick and roll and didn't pass the ball, did he earn any free throws. He's also turnover-prone, which further reduces his effectiveness in these situations.
So what's there to like about Blake? As a passer in the pick-and-roll, he's dynamite. He tends to find the big man rolling to the basket--67 times in 123 possessions--and Orlando has, in Dwight Howard and Marcin Gortat, two tremendously efficient roll-man targets.
Blake also has three-point range on his jumper, with a 39.3% mark for his career, and 39.5% last year combined between the Blazers and Clippers. It's not a sample-size issue, either, as he's averaged no fewer than 2.1 trey attempts per game in any of his pro seasons, and nearly half of his overall shot attempts have come from the outside.
What's less encouraging, though, is that he can't get that three-pointer on his own. Indeed, teammates have assisted 91.4% of Blake's three-pointers over the last four seasons, and that's with four different teams with four different offenses. He can't create his own shot, be it a three-pointer or a two.
Where Blake looks great is in terms of taking care of the ball. John Hollinger's Pure Point Rating, a time-adjusted measure of passing efficiency which counts a turnover as more harmful than an assist is helpful, rates Blakes as among the league's most careful ballhandlers; his combined 5.8 rating last year tied him with LeBron James for 10th among qualified players.
Synergy rates Blake's defense as "very good," but there's a big red flag, one that should be expected. His lack of athleticism makes him an incredible liability in isolation situations, which accounted for nearly one-in-five of the possessions he defended last year in Portland. Teams know that weakness, and exploit it. In Orlando, he'd have Howard and Gortat covering for him, which helps mitigate that a bit. Still, that's a worrisome weakness for a team that values defense as much as the Magic do.
Blake's efficient distributing and threat of an outside shot make him mildly attractive for Orlando, yet his inability to get his own shot presents a problem: with teams always playing him for the pass, how can he keep the offense going? In all, he sounds like merely a younger version of Jason Williams, whom he'd replace were the Magic to sign him, albeit one without the requisite speed or inclination to push the ball. He's worth keeping an eye on.
Chris Duhon
Two years ago, Smith made Duhon his top target in free agency, offering him a portion of the mid-level exception for three years to back up Nelson and play for a winning program. The Knicks offered him more money, as well as the chance to start, over fewer years. He chose that, and the privilege of playing in New York City, over being Nelson's caddy, and Smith gave Mickael Pietrus the money he initially earmarked for Duhon. Funny how that all turned out.
What makes Duhon intriguing is that he's familiar with a pick-and-roll-heavhy system, having played the "Steve Nash" role in Mike D'Antoni's seven-seconds-or-less offense for the Knicks over the last two seasons. Thanks largely to David Lee's incredible finishing ability, Duhon rates well as a pick-and-roll player, producing 1.016 points per possessions counting his offense and that of other players for whom he creates in the pick-and-roll. As is the case with Blake, though, it's the "his offense" part of the equation that needs work. Duhon committed turnovers 20.8% of the time in his own pick-and-roll offense, which ranks 50th among the 51 players with a minimum of 200 pick-and-roll possessions.
Duhon is a competent three-point shooter, with a 36.2% career mark and a 37.2% showing with the Knicks. He uses fewer possessions overall than Blake--his usage rate of 13.1 is lower than Blake's of 14.8--yet when he does, he's more likely to get his own shot, as he's assisted on a shade less than half his baskets. The point being that he seems capable enough when it comes to getting his offense.
Duhon rates ahead of Blake in terms of playmaking efficiency, with the 8th-best Pure Point Rating in the NBA last season.
Though similar to Blake in a lot of ways on offense, he's like Blakezarro on the other side of the floor: an excellent individual defender (0.676 points per possession yielded in isolation settings) who struggles to execute team schemes. The increased emphasis on defense in Orlando may help him tighten up, however.
Luke Ridnour
Ridnour had a tremendous second season under Scott Skiles in Milwaukee, with career-bests in percentages from the field, three-point range, and the foul line. He also posted the second-best assist rate,and best turnover rate, of hsi career, while appearing in all 82 games for the first time since 2004/05, his sophomore NBA campaign. Contract-year push? Some dumb luck? Both? Neither? Whatever the reason, Ridnour's value has never been higher.
For a guy with such a slight frame and limited athleticism, Ridnour sure can get his own shot. Surprisingly, he's more likely to look for that out of the pick-and-roll than he is to find a teammate, though that might be a product of his role in Milwaukee rather than a true reflection of his abilities. His balance as a pick-and-roll player, in terms of passing, is really remarkable: 47.2% of the time his passes found their way to spot-up shooters, but 45% of the time he sent them to the roll-man instead. Coupled with his aggressiveness--he called his own number on 57.8% of his pick-and-rolls--he's a guy who can put a surprising level of pressure on a defense.
The three-pointer was kind to him as well, as he hit 38.1% of his triple-tries last year. It could be a fluke, however, as the only time he approached that level of three-point proficiency was in 2004/05, when he drained 37.6% of his treys as a SuperSonic. His jump-shooting last season seems flukey, as his 57% showing on long two-pointers--after connecting on 44%, 41%, ad 45% in the three years prior--attests. Orlando can't expect him to duplicate that performance if it signs him.
Ridnour's Pure Point Rating of 6.3 bests Blakes and is just shy of Duhon's but he didn't play enough minutes to qualify for KnickerBlogger's leaderboard. His defense is similarly nondescript: though he's not an asset, Synergy's data don't paint him as the liability his reputation suggests he is.
Given the options so far, Ridnour's the best of the bunch, but also the most costly. And there's no guarantee he will be able to even approximate his productivity from last season. From that standpoint, it might behoove the Magic to save some money by getting a less talented, but more known, commodity. But Ridnour's ability to create for himself makes him a tougher cover, which is something the Magic ought to consider.
Earl Watson
Hoo, boy. Watson is the least offensively-inclined player surveyed in this post. If the thought of Steve Blake trying to generate his own shot frightened you, well, you need to steel yourself for Watson's numbers. In 138 pick-and-rolls in which he called his own number, Watson produced a staggeringly horrible 0.580 points per possession, including more turnovers (44) than field goals. In fact, his 31.9% turnover rate was dead-last, by a wide margin, among the 95 players who ran at least 100 pick-and-rolls for themselves. He shot just 12-of-30, with 8 turnovers, when he tried taking the ball all the way to the basket. He is a nightmare, really, and doesn't merit guarding.
But--did you see the "but" coming?--there's a major caveat: of all the players surveyed here, he's the best at generating offense for others in the pick-and-roll, with 1.176 points per possession.
The book on Watson is fairly simple: he can get others involved, but that's about it. Blake, Duhon, and Ridnour have outside shots on which to rely, but the same is not true of Watson, who nonetheless takes two-thirds of his jumpers from beyond the arc, at a 30.5% clip. The turnovers and lack of range make him a poor fit in the Magic's offense.
But--predictable yet?--he's one of the top defenders among all free-agent point guards.
Watson happens to be the subject of the most spot-on Ball Don't Lie Create-A-Caption yet. The runner-up caption fits neatly with the idea I'm trying to convey in this post.
Summarily, if the Magic want a point guard who can break a defense down off the dribble, they might have to look elsewhere. However, each of these players could be useful, albeit to varying degrees, in the Magic's offense were they to sign here. Were I making the personnel moves, I would rank Ridnour first, Duhon second, Blake third, and Watson fourth. Of course, Smith's opinion, and yours, may vary.
77 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
None should be an option
Blake is the only 3-point shooter in the group, but likely wants too much money at $6 mil or so.
"There are two ways to argue with a woman, and neither of them work."; Carlos Boozer
I'll tell ya about the Magic It'll free your soul but it's like trying to tell a stranger 'bout rock n roll
The only way to stop LeBron is Smith and Wesson, but even that's a double team.
by NC Magic Fan on Jun 28, 2010 4:25 PM EDT reply actions
How can Ridnour not be at 99% for this vote? Did you guys watch the NBA last year?
The real "Masters of Panic" are commenting on this blog.
by ben_gleicher on Jun 28, 2010 4:32 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Yea, I agree. Ridnour was very solid last year. Duhon had a terrible year I think. Blake and Watson were solid.
by derekk on Jun 28, 2010 5:50 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
For the same reason
That most people woudln’t have given Ariza a MLE deal after one good season with the Lakers.
Regression to the mean.
I really like Ridnour and Blake and don’t really like Duhon or Watson, but I think Blake’s the most likely to have another solid season. I guess it’s possible Ridnour’s had a breakout to a new level of player – in which case he’s a starter in this league, not a backup – but I think it’s more likely his numbers will slide back to closer to his career averages.
Given the cash he’ll want, I don’t think that’s enough production. Blake’s the best option for me. But, as I said, I’d be happy with either.
by eltharion_doa on Jun 29, 2010 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Ridnour's career averages still best the other three in the poll.
Obviously no one thinks he can duplicate last season’s performance, because he was absolutely terrific. Even just “average,” a PER right around 15, would be a great asset for Orlando.
The real "Masters of Panic" are commenting on this blog.
by ben_gleicher on Jun 29, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions
probably too expensive for a marginal back up who is only going to play 18 minutes a game
we need a young point guard to groom, not a semi-overpriced backup. our vet PG needs to be available for the BIE or possibly the veteran’s minimum.
Eh.
Remember that at this point, the Magic count on their point guard to do virtually all of the offensive management. That’s almost a third of the game where the backup is the general out there. Plus it’s sadly likely Jameer will miss some games in any given season…
Jason Williams was on the court for 1702 minutes in 2009-10. (Plus 192 in the playoffs.) He was the initiator of the Magic’s offensive scheme in almost all of those minutes. And in the playoffs (and more than one late regular-season game), Williams’ inadequacy for that role proved disastrous.
This is not a position where it’s appropriate to scrape by, make do, or gamble. You need a solid guy out there who you know can make things happen. Skimp on a backup wing player or a PF if you need to. Even a center. You pay for a good point guard, or you keep everyone else from earning the money you paid them.
I call him LeBron Jim for short.
Don't get me wrong
I agree he’s probably the best player of the four, but I don’t think he represents value for money given we’ll need to find a starting SF under the MLE as well – we can’t really just give it all to Ridnour.
by eltharion_doa on Jun 29, 2010 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Assuming if none of them go over 3 million (big if), I wouldn't mind any of them.
They are all valuable as good back-up point guards that could occasionally start when Jameer inevitably sits out 20 games or so.
Even though the Hippopotamus lacks a stinger for a tail, a truly wise man would rather be sat on by a bee. ~ Banacek
Why not look to bring Keyon Dooling back as well, since he was (supposidly) cut by the Nets today?
Good Guys Don't use the reply button
He was waived, yes.
The real "Masters of Panic" are commenting on this blog.
by ben_gleicher on Jun 28, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Yea not a bad choice at all. I like what Dooling brings.
by derekk on Jun 28, 2010 5:48 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I wouldn't mind Dooling as a third PG/SG.
But he doesn’t run offenses.
I call him LeBron Jim for short.
Dooling wouldn’t be a terrible choice, I don’t think. His 3pt shooting isn’t exactly ideal, but more open looks might help with that. Not a great facilitator of the offense, but he’s a pretty competent on the ball defender. Doesn’t make steals but keeps his man in front of him
I wouldn’t mind paying Dooling with that 3.8 million he was owed with New Jersey
Only $500,000 owed.
Had he been on the roster tomorrow he would have been owed his full salary. So he may be looking for half the MLE himself. Not worth it here IMO.
Life's too short. Be a fan. Orlando Magic, Arizona Cardinals,Tampa Bay Rays and of course "the U"! What a winning combo.
He doesn't score and he doesn't run the offense.
His defense is the only good thing about him, and honestly, that’s not what we need at the backup point. We need a passer who can shoot the three. That’s all.
I call him LeBron Jim for short.
You obviously haven't seen Keyon lately....
His assist rate has skyrocketed and he’s shot 40% from 3 with the Nets. And yeah, his defense is good.
The real "Masters of Panic" are commenting on this blog.
by ben_gleicher on Jun 29, 2010 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions
hes a career 35% shooter
which isnt bad, but he shot 37% in the most recent year, and the 42% he shot in 08-09 is an outlier as his previous best percentage before that year was 36% which was 02-03 with the Clippers
In all fairness, I suppose his shooting has improved.
He was a 39.8% shooter last year, albeit on a horrible Nets team, but he has shot the three well for two years now.
Still, his passing doesn’t impress me at all. 2.5 assists in 18.3 minutes, especially on a team like the Nets, which lacks ball-handling options, is not an acceptable ratio. And it’s tough to argue that anything here has “skyrocketed”; his career numbers are 19.6 minutes and 2.2 assists per game.
Anthony Johnson this season: 13.1 MPG, 2.0 APG.
We’re not looking for Dad + a defensive upgrade. And if we were, we’d be looking for that to replace Dad, not to replace Williams..
(Which, as I said below, wouldn’t be the worst idea, if Dooling is up for it and doesn’t get a better offer. Dooling could also play third-string SG — he’d be a solid tenth-man type. But not a guy you ideally want running the point for a third of the game — any more than Dad is now.)
I call him LeBron Jim for short.
I like Dooling
As the third choice combo guard. He shouldn’t crack the ten man rotation but he’s a very, very solid end of the bench guy.
by eltharion_doa on Jun 29, 2010 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions
This list should be:
1) Ridnour
2) Blake
3) Watson
4) Duhon
by derekk on Jun 28, 2010 5:47 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Also, why not just keep Jason Williams? If Magic can’t nab a younger PG via FA/trade and these are the options, then White Chocolate should be in the conversation, maybe even with the advantage.
by derekk on Jun 28, 2010 5:54 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
yeah at the beginning of the year he was very good but began fading
by doublettoluca on Jun 28, 2010 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions
+ he did schooled a bit Ridnour in that Bucks game.
But seriously, if I have to chose one of the four guys, I would go with Ridnour too, I was hoping for a younger 2nd back up though.
Don't mind my spelling. I'm a Typo Master.
If J-Will comes back, he'll most likely be the third point guard.
I write for Magic Basketball and have a Twitter account.
I like Ridnour.
Good distributor, shoots the three, doesn’t do anything stupid.
Blake’s not a bad option. Ridnour’s a better passer, and probably a better decision-maker, but Blake can pass and shoot the three. That’s all that matters.
Duhon works for me as well — though I’m not convinced he’s as smart a floor general as some of these guys.
Watson’s lack of shooting is a problem, but he’s a good passer, and could probably make it work.
I think none of these guys is a downgrade from early-season J-Will, and every one of them is a huge upgrade over late-season J-Will. I’d probably take Ridnour first, but I don’t see a name here that doesn’t fit.
I call him LeBron Jim for short.
So it's Earl that's unrestricted, not CJ?
Hmm.. anyway I prefer Duhon or Ridnour. The former is also a Duke man, maybe he’ll do well with JJ. Ridnour? Well another contributor to the Magic all-white second unit
Sign 'n' trade for Ridnour and John Salmons???
How do y’all feel if we can get both of these gentlemen on our team? I think both are an upgrade at the positions they play. Ridnour is an upgrade at PG-2 and Salmons is better than Vince. How is Salmons defensively compared to Vince?
Salmons is not better than Carter.
Bitterness is all well and good, but let us not get silly here.
I call him LeBron Jim for short.
Even defensively?
I can’t imagine Salmons being a less of a defender than Vince. Also he is younger and cheaper. Doesn’t that mean something in terms of value?
by warrior1141 on Jun 28, 2010 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Younger, cheaper, but worse. The Magic are trying to win now, and Carter--as the better player--will help them win now better than Salmons can.
“Value” isn’t really a concern for a tax-paying team trying to win now.
by Evan Dunlap on Jun 28, 2010 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Stats...
Salmons w/ Bucks: FG% = .467 3FG% = .385 FT% = .867 RPG = 3.2 APG = 3.3 SPG = 1.1 PPG = 19.9 ORtg = 116 DRtg = 106
Vince w/ Magic: FG% = .428 3FG% = .367 FT% = .840 RPG = 3.9 APG = 3.1 SPG = 0.7 PPG = 16.6 ORtg = 112 DRtg = 105
Salmons is better in 8 categories. Sure he only played 30 games with the Bucks but he played very well. He also played well in the playoffs. Just sayin…
by warrior1141 on Jun 28, 2010 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions
wow
Backing up the argument with Stats..
With that said, Salmons isn’t going to bring Orlando a championship..
FEED THE BEAST!!!
Twitter Account
Salmons' combined stats for Game 6 and Game 7 of Milwaukee's first round playoff matchup with Atlanta
…9.5 PPG on 7 for 31 FG shooting (22.6% FG shooting), including 1 for 8 3 PT shooting.
Not exactly what you would call clutch in the most important games of the Bucks’ season.
Orlando Magic... 2010 Eastern Conference Finalist
Chicago Blackhawks... 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Champions!!
by Mike from Illinois on Jun 29, 2010 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions
In a contract year, too.
"...your eyes lie to you sometimes..." ~SVG on the place and value of advanced metrics/stats
by magicfaninTN on Jun 29, 2010 5:29 AM EDT up reply actions
carter had 11 pts Combined in games 4 and 5
whats better 9.5PPG or 5.5PPG? None obviously..none of the two are going to take the magic anywhere
Well, if you can do that...
…I can bring in Vince’s second-half stats last year. That’s 41 games, and in the same part of the season too.
I call him LeBron Jim for short.
I don't wanna change the subject here...
But is there going to be a post addressing some of these Magic trade rumors, specifically involving Gilbert Arenas, which is picking up steam in the media. This disturbs me, and I can’t imagine Otis making this desperate move.
Why make a rumors post? Leave that to the speculators.
This is generally a NEWS site that discusses actual items of news. If Ben hears about an eminent trade (which is not going to happen until FA signing period begins), I am sure he will post it. Most of the places that post those trade rumors are just doing it to increase their own traffic. We should know in the next 10 days or so the direction that the team will be heading (that is when the TurK TPE expires).
I didn't find the Arenas rumor on some obscure site while doing a google search or something...
The story was on ESPN.com, referencing an article from CBS.com writer Ken Berger.
Speculation has been addressed here before. When there was a “rumor” about the Magic inquiring about Chris Paul, Ben made a post about it on this site. I know there are 100’s of baseless rumors out there used as marketing tools. But this one appeared to be picking up a little steam on some reputable sports sites. I don’t know if it has any credence or not. I just wanted to hear an opinion or 2.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/features/rumors#16916
http://ken-berger.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/11838893/22848009?source=rss_blogs_NBA
How the four players did in PER ranking last season
Luke Ridnour: 17.7
Steve Blake: 11.6
Earl Watson: 10.9
Chris Duhon: 10.7
Orlando Magic... 2010 Eastern Conference Finalist
Chicago Blackhawks... 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Champions!!
by Mike from Illinois on Jun 29, 2010 1:36 AM EDT reply actions
But it is worth mentioning
that Ridnour’s shooting this year was WAY ahead of anything he had done in the past. I like Ridnour, and I would love to see him as the Magic’s backup point guard next season — but he’s not going to shoot 47%/38%/90% in 2010-11.
I call him LeBron Jim for short.
Amare
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-stoudemiresuns062810
Magic are an option for Stoudemire…?!
by Robin from Germany on Jun 29, 2010 4:42 AM EDT reply actions
I watched the Blazers
the past two years, and I’m not sure Blake is the best at getting the ball into the post. There were numerous times, especially at the beginning of this past season, where Greg Oden would be wide open, defender sealed, and at the rim, where Blake would just hesitate with the pass, and the opposing team would close the passing lane.
Out of the 4, Luke is the best. But Luke is not coming to the Magic when he could earn more money and more pt somewhere else.
Blake is the next best, I just hope for Dwight’s sake, and Marcin’s, that if he does become a Magic, that he’ll work on that post entry pass, and do it a whole lot quicker.
Boom-shocka-locka!!!
I voted Duhon
OK, his numbers weren’t stellar, but he was on the 29-53 Knicks. That team didn’t have the depth to be good, despite having a few good individual players. He shoots the 3 at a decent rate, and at a high volume, so it’s not a small sample size. He has a 3.4 AST/TO ratio, to Ridnour’s 3.1, Blake’s 3.0, and Watson’s 2.3. He and Ridnour both have a .085 WS/48 for their careers. Blake has a .071, and Watson a .054. Does he need to work on the turnovers on P&R? Sure, but that’s about the only downside I see to his game compared to the others.
Honor is no substitute for victory.
I also think he could be a "value" get. Ridnour's coming off his best year, whereas Duhon's stock has dropped dramatically
Ridnour’s a better fit in Orlando, yeah, and I prefer him. But Duhon wouldn’t be a terrible consolation prize, I don’t think.
I just don't think he does anything especially well
Apart from distribute. He’s an inconsistent scorer and shooter year on year, and at best he’s only an average three point shooter. And he doesn’t take care of the ball well, with the highest TO% of the three best options. That so many of these come in the P&R, our staple offense, just makes it worse.
by eltharion_doa on Jun 29, 2010 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Duhon's shot just disappeared last year.
"...your eyes lie to you sometimes..." ~SVG on the place and value of advanced metrics/stats
by magicfaninTN on Jun 30, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Whoops.
Actually it wasn’t too far below his not-too-great career averages. But it was surprising in a contract year on a disorganized team that he had the kind of year he did last season.
I suppose he might make a good backup PG for the right [low] money.
"...your eyes lie to you sometimes..." ~SVG on the place and value of advanced metrics/stats
by magicfaninTN on Jun 30, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
No.
He doesn’t.
Even though the Hippopotamus lacks a stinger for a tail, a truly wise man would rather be sat on by a bee. ~ Banacek
Washington is letting Foye walk
so I think he’s at least worth a look.
by Ol' Uncle Munnerlyn on Jun 29, 2010 2:43 PM EDT reply actions
blake has the most consistent proven track record.....
and i’m sure he would like to win a lot of games at this stage of his career…..
Just one man's opinion...
"mark my words...we will draft 2 corners within the first 4 picks" - 2009
"mark my words...we will draft 4 new linebackers this off-season" - 2010
and the best three point shot...........that might be his best asset in the magic system
he has shot over 40% in his last three seasons…….his playoff numbers are better than duhon’s as well……..including the fact that he was the starting pg for denver 06/07 and portland 08/09
his comparison to white chocolate is pretty good…..he is less physically gifted but he is from florida and he is the tallest of the 4 choices up above……at 6’3", i like his length….all we need him to do is steer his man to the middle……and like i said, if he can hit the three that would allow him to cover less ground getting back on defense…..especially in van gundy’s system……
his road to the magic would be similar to matt barnes, and i think we could see a similar result as well….obviously not starting but the kind of effort and consistency that barnes brought…..he’s my favorite of the four…….i think he fits our system the best…..
Just one man's opinion...
"mark my words...we will draft 2 corners within the first 4 picks" - 2009
"mark my words...we will draft 4 new linebackers this off-season" - 2010
Did somebody already ask....
Why no Shaun Livingston?
"...your eyes lie to you sometimes..." ~SVG on the place and value of advanced metrics/stats
Well, personally, I prefer basketball players with knees...
;)
Honor is no substitute for victory.
Like DeJuan Blair?
"...your eyes lie to you sometimes..." ~SVG on the place and value of advanced metrics/stats
by magicfaninTN on Jun 30, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I love him
But I just don’t see him on the Magic.
by eltharion_doa on Jul 1, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Blake's signing with the Lakers.
http://www.silverscreenandroll.com/2010/7/2/1550283/lakers-come-to-very-favorable
Great info on him. Thanks, Ben, for providing us with info on our new acquisition =]]
If Kobe doesn't make his teammates better, how on Earth does Adam Morrison have two rings!?
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure."
http://www.silverscreenandroll.com/ - Visit, and be loved. Troll, and die a painful death. =]]
Questions? Queries? Comments? Concerns? Expletive-filled inflammatory trolling? Contact me at saurav.a.das.1994@gmail.com

by 












