Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why We're Skeptical Of LeBron James

Orlando Magic 111, Cleveland Cavaliers 100

The Orlando Magic did essentially whatever they wanted against the Cleveland Cavaliers' overmatched defense in their 111-100 victory Friday night, riding another strong interior performance from Dwight Howard (23 points on 5-of-9 shooting) and, a solid step forward for the team, and accurate (14-of-31) three-point shooting, turning in their second-most efficient offensive outing of the year. The Magic made 11 of those three-pointers in the first half en route to opening up a 13-point lead, keeping victory just out of the Cavaliers' reach the rest of the way even when the treys stopped dropping.

I give Cleveland a lot of credit for hanging around and playing well above its station; this is a team that competed hard, but didn't necessarily play well, for the full 48 minutes. And the Magic can't be too pleased with their performance on the night, as the Cavaliers shot 8-of-21 from long range and won the rebounding battle, 39-33, two things that could have cost the Magic the game were it not for their own hot outside shooting. Defense, too, was a concern: Antawn Jamison scored 22 points in 30 minutes, while reserve point guard Ramon Sessions got wherever he wanted to on the court and finished with 13 points on 6-of-8 shooting to go with 6 assists.

The Cavaliers aren't a terribly talented team, but they can put these sorts of points on the board if their opponents aren't careful. I think it's safe to say the Magic weren't entirely engaged defensively. Then again, they didn't exactly need to be, given the ease with which they scored themselves. I'm scarcely an expert, OK, but it stands to reason that hoopsters lose focus defensively when they hardly miss anything offensively. Against a bottom-feeding team like Cleveland--and don't let the 6-9 record fool you, this team will finish well into the lottery, given that it's faced an easy schedule with unimpressive results--the Magic can get away with some slippage. That won't be the case against more capable opponents, though.

Star-divide

TeamPaceEfficiencyeFG%FT RateOReb%TO Rate
Cavaliers93107.651.8%14.127.515.1
Magic90123.965.3%23.612.514.5
Green denotes a stat better than the team's season average;
red denotes a stat worse than the team's season average.

The Cavaliers don't really have much going on defensively. Anderson Varejao always plays Howard well, and gets under his skin a bit, but it seemed any sort of action that forced Varejao to provide help defense elsewhere resulted in an easy Magic bucket. Jameer Nelson, Chris Duhon, and J.J. Redick all aggressively probed the Cavaliers' defense, didn't meet much resistance on the perimeter, and managed to create easy looks. Say what you will about the Magic's mediocre work at the other end of the floor, but they indeed deserve praise for moving the ball around and getting wide-open looks. Curiously, Cleveland didn't seem too worried about Orlando's three-point shooting. While it wasn't as though Quentin Richardson (4-of-5), Redick (3-of-6), and Duhon (2-of-3) were shooting in an empty gym, they did get most of their looks reasonably open and in rhythm.

Under coach Byron Scott, the Cavaliers run the Princeton offense, with which I've never been impressed. The Magic have proven effective in limiting it in recent years, against the Eddie Jordan-coached Washington Wizards and Philadelphia 76ers. But tonight, Mo Williams and Sessions kept the Magic guessing with their dribble-drives, and they too managed to find the seams in Orlando's defense. As a result, the Cavaliers, who start the offensive non-entity Varejao in the pivot--scored 44 points in the paint. The point here is that Orlando's defense can't continue to be a step slow against better teams.

Tonight's game was the sort of one that the Magic have every now and again where they shoot so well from the outside that it masks their deficiencies elsewhere. Orlando will certainly take the 11-point victory, and season-best performances from Duhon and Richardson, and another win without top perimeter scorer Vince Carter, and yet another brilliant performance from Jameer Nelson (20 points, 9-of-13 shooting, 6 assists). These things are all welcome. But the poor defensive rotations and lack of commitment to rebounding are red flags. One hopes they're simply a result of playing a far inferior opponent, and not a sign of deeper problems. Given that the Magic have ranked among the league's top teams in terms of defense and rebounding all year, the former is probable. The latter, though, is possible. Something worth keeping in mind, particularly on Saturday night, when the Magic play an even worse Wizards team that shouldn't present them many challenges at all.

If Nelson sustains this level of play, he'll certainly join Howard in Los Angeles this February for the NBA All-Star Game.

Comment 53 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Raptorblog Talks to Vince Carter

May 2012 from Raptors HQ - 10 comments

Who Is Elliot Williams?

May 2012 from Blazer's Edge - 58 comments

Comments

Display:

hate to say it,

but i don’t think jameer has much of a chance this year. look at his competition!

dwyane weade
rajon rondo
derrick rose
stephen jackson
joe johnson
gilbert arenas
raymond felton
devin harris
brandon jennings
john wall
mo williams
ray allen

considering market size, and the fact that jameer has always been a bit underrated, i can’t be too optimistic.

by kerem on Nov 27, 2010 4:01 AM EST reply actions  

While 'Meer is playing better than half of the names on that list,

that still isn’t enough to get him into the game. Sadface.

by fwedo on Nov 27, 2010 9:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Nelson would only be there as a PG...

…so I’d say remove any names of those that normally play SG – this eliminates several of the “biggest” names on the list like Wade, Arenas, and Allen.

Rondo and Rose are pretty much locks, and rightly so. After them, I think Nelson has a pretty good argument to being as good as or better than anyone else on the list at PG the way he’s playing. Depending on how many PGs they put on the roster, he’s got a solid shot at making it in.

by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Nov 27, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

pg wise

i think only derick rose and rondo are having a better year (if you factor in stats AND team success)

by jiggadpg00 on Nov 27, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

and honestly

maybe its cuz im bias, but I think Rondo isn’t that much better than Nelson..he cant shoot at all which is a big part of the game…yes he can pass and play D better, but Nelson destroys him in shooting and clutchness

by jiggadpg00 on Nov 27, 2010 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm the biggest fan of Nelson here, or close.

I tend to overvalue the ability to shoot from outside. (And not just in the Magic’s system, where it makes sense to overvalue outside shooting.)

And no, Nelson is not comparable to Rondo. I’d like to believe they were close… but they aren’t. At this point, Rondo is comparable to Paul or Nash as a passer, and it’s hard to argue anyone is a better defensive PG than he is. He’s something of a liability as a scorer, but he gets his teammates so many high-percentage shots, he makes up for it.

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 28, 2010 2:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Westbrook is an overall better player than Rondo.

I think he might even be a better defender than Rondo. Rondo has been torched before by opposing PG’s, anyone who rivals his quickness honestly. Granted, there are only a few who can make that claim, but he gambles too much and relies on that quickness more than other elite defensive PG’s like Paul and Westbrook. He also is possibly the worst jump shooting PG in the league.

All that said, his assist numbers this year are staggering. And he’s a better overall player than Nelson certainly, as hard as it is for me to say that.

I love LeBron. No really, I love Jameer.

by slickw143 on Nov 28, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Westbrook?

I’m not convinced by Westbrook, who is such a nightmare as a shooter I find it hard to care about any of his other gifts. Yes, he’s reasonably efficient so far this year, but that’s just because he’s getting to the line so much. Which is all well and good if he maintains that pace, but I’d like to see it before making any proclamations. It’s WAY off his pace in his first two seasons, and honestly looks like a big fluke to me.

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 29, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I heard that Westbrook never palyed PG before coming

to the league and you know that is something that needs time to learn. I like watching the guy play a lot, which I agree it doesn’t mean much. So yes, let’s wait and see at the end of the season if he’s really is as good as he started out to be.

Don't mind my spelling. I'm a Typo Master.

by 44792212 on Nov 30, 2010 8:13 AM EST up reply actions  

But it's not his passing that's the problem for me.

It’s his shooting.

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 30, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Also

How is Rondo “the worst jump-shooting PG in the league”? He can’t make the outside shots, so he doesn’t shoot them. To me, that puts him in a class ahead of all the PGs who can’t make the outside shots, but shoot them anyway. The Derrick Roses and Baron Davises of the world.

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 29, 2010 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh.

I’m not looking at anything fancy, I’m just looking at the basic stats.

He used to shoot around one three a game, which was too much, but I’m assuming he just found himself with time running down or something.

This season, he’s averaging 4, even though he’s a 32% shooter from beyond the arc.

It’s wasteful, is what it is.

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 29, 2010 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

D-Rose's job right now isn't to be Steve Nash kind of efficient

(which he won’t probably ever be) but to carry his team on his shouldiers. And so far he has done a good job at it.

Don't mind my spelling. I'm a Typo Master.

by 44792212 on Nov 30, 2010 8:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't understand.

How does he “carry his team” by blowing possessions on low-percentage shots?

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 30, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

The bulls have a better record (first in division)

than most of us thought in the begining of the season when the Boozer guy broke his arm. I know your opinion about Rose and Westbrook but right now they’re doing a fine job.
They both should not take threes but their FG% are quite allright. Westbrook takes 33% of his shots close to the rim (Jameer for ex is at 24%)
Maybe it’s a fluke, maybe not. I’m not being sarcastic or anything when I say let’s wait to find out.

Don't mind my spelling. I'm a Typo Master.

by 44792212 on Nov 30, 2010 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree.

Remember, I’m kind of a Clippers fan, so I’m ultra-wary of high-volume, low-efficiency PGs. And if there’s one thing I believe about basketball a little too much, it’s that threes are good and long twos are bad. So my perspective is a little skewed.

But it’s not fair to assume these two guys will never get it right, or that the other things they do won’t make up for their scoring inefficiencies.

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 30, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Dwight Howard's 24 free throw attempts ties his career high

…which was set on two occasions… in January of 2008 at Utah, where he made 17 of the 24 free throws while scoring 29 points in a loss, and January of 2010 against Indiana, where he made 16 of the 24 free throws for 32 points in a win.

Against the Cavaliers, he made just 13 of the 24 free throws.

Interestingly, the rest of the Magic shot just four free throws combined as a team, as Nelson and Lewis each went 2 for 2. Thank goodness the outside shots were falling!

Great to see Richardson and Duhon come alive offensively. I’ll take all the positives from this game that came on the offensive side, and I won’t worry too much about the sub-par defense, unless it happens again against the Wizards Saturday night.

"Bear Down, Chicago Bears"...
Chicago Blackhawks... 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Champions
Orlando Magic... 2009 NBA Eastern Conference Champions

by Mike from Illinois on Nov 27, 2010 4:34 AM EST reply actions  

A bit concerning the sudden drop off in Dwight’s FTs.. from 8-10 to 3-14 (or something like that)… how does one explain that?

by RL Magic on Nov 27, 2010 9:03 AM EST reply actions  

Random chance?

It’s easy to get caught up in patterns that aren’t there. But free-throw shooting is essentially a coin flip. (Of course, Dwight’s free-throw shooting is perilously close to being 50-50.) Sometimes things come up heads, other times they come up tails. Sample sizes of 10 and 14 aren’t aanywhere near enough to think things have changed…

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 27, 2010 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for clearing it up. The original post was not clear in referring to Dwight only.

I am not convinced, however, that – with more practice and better focus – free throw shooting cannot be improved unless when there is something wrong with the mechanics or natural build of the players (e.g., Dwight is not Shaq).

by Matt1325 on Nov 27, 2010 5:58 PM EST up reply actions  

No.

I’m not saying that Dwight couldn’t theoretically be better than the 55-60% FT shooter he is.

I’m saying that one-game deviations from a player’s average are essentially a matter of random chance. If Dwight shoots 8-10 from the line, it doesn’t mean there was something inherently different about his approach… it just means that his (55-60% quality) shots happened to go in more than usual.

Conversely, If Jameer shoots 6-11 or something, it doesn’t mean Jameer was doing something wrong… it’s just that the small chance of Jameer missing a FT happened to turn up more often than usual.

I didn’t mean a “coin flip” as in a 50-50 chance, I meant it as in an essentially random result. You can think of it as a roll of the dice if you prefer — an 83% shooter’s free throws as the odds of rolling a 2 or higher, a 67% shooter as being a 3 or better, etc. And because of random chance, there’s always going to come a time when even the best FT guys roll a bunch of ones.

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 28, 2010 2:14 AM EST up reply actions  

What stands out from the match, which Evan dissected very well, was defense and rebounding.

1 – Magic can certainly ramp up the defense against better teams, but not with desired consistency. Therefore, it is imperative to discipline themselves to play committed defense regardless of the opponent.
2 – Rebounding is a totally different matter. Dwight’s rebounding is certainly down although the rest of the team is compensating for it, to some extent. The commitment to rebounding has to be emphatically re-affirmed by the coach, and the players to be accountable for it.

by Matt1325 on Nov 27, 2010 9:14 AM EST reply actions  

Dwight's rebounding is not down. (Certainly.)

He’s grabbing 31.7% of defensive rebounds this season. That’s actually (barely) a career high. He averaged 31.3% last year, 29.5% in 2008-09 and 31.6% in 2007-08.

His offensive rebounding, if anyone cares about that, is slightly down from previous years. This is likely due to the fact that it’s frequently Bass, not Dwight, who crashes the offensive boards nowadays. (Or else to the fact that Dwight is focusing on transition D rather than going fishing.)

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 27, 2010 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought the league was computing rebounding based on the number of rebounds per game

Dwight was the leading re-bounder at 13.2 RAVG last season but is at 12 rebounds per game so far this season.

by Matt1325 on Nov 27, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, that's not the number that matters.

If there are fewer rebounds to be had, of course Dwight is going to get fewer rebounds. (And keep in mind Dwight is only playing 33.7 MPG so far this year.)

But the player who gets 10 rebounds out of 40 available is the same quality rebounder as the guy who gets 15 rebounds out of 60 available. That’s obvious.

You mess with the 4-out/1-in, you get the Horns.

by 3.3seconds on Nov 28, 2010 2:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I missed the game last night...

Is there a reason Meer only played 28 mins?

by malars on Nov 27, 2010 11:15 AM EST reply actions  

back2back ?

Don't mind my spelling. I'm a Typo Master.

by 44792212 on Nov 27, 2010 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

all of the above

and Duhon wasn’t sucking so I guess Stan wanted him to have more minutes

I'm a girl.

by TheGiantSquid on Nov 27, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Vstan_small
2012 NBA Draft Primer (★Magic Edition★)

Recent FanPosts

Vstan_small
Rocket Plan
Small
Please not again...
Small
Otis Smith, a fair comprehensive trial of all his trades.
Images_small
Dwightdreams: Superteam or Traditional Team
Small
Rumor - Dwight to Miami for Bosch/Wade
Avatar_small
Sign an Extension or be Traded ... Fallacy or Simplicity?
Small
IF you could build your own team? MR/MRS. GM
Small
Would this be a Beast in the East or not?
Images_small
Ryan Anderson: To Re-sign or Not
Orlando_magic_logoish_small
Deron Williams CAN sign a Max Deal with Orlando (Not a S&T)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Contact Us

General Twitter feed

Evan Dunlap, Managing Editor / Press Contact

Tiny Blogroll

Rather than include our complete blogroll in this space, we've decided to link to it instead. That way, you won't have to do as much scrolling. Enjoy.


Managing Editor

Minimalistchalksquare_small Evan Dunlap

Contributing Writer

Primaryosb-logo_small Mike from Illinois