Orlando Magic 2010/11 Season Preview
Team Name: Orlando Magic
Last Year's Record: 59-23
Key Losses: small forward Matt Barnes (via free agency to the L.A. Lakers), center Adonal Foyle (via retirement; now serves as Director of Player Development), point guard Anthony Johnson (via free agency; not re-signed).
Key Additions: point guard Chris Duhon (via free agency from the New York Knicks), center Daniel Orton (via the NBA Draft from Kentucky), small forward Quentin Richardson (via free agency from the Miami Heat). Additionally, power forward Malik Allen (via free agency from the Denver Nuggets) and small forward Stanley Robinson (via the NBA Draft from Connecticut) have joined the team on non-guaranteed contracts.
What significant moves were made during the offseason?
This offseason was a quiet one for the Magic. They made their big splash last summer when they acquired Vince Carter from the New Jersey Nets, having him replace Hedo Turkoglu's role in the offense. Rather than making any trades, GM Otis Smith split his mid-level exception on Duhon and Richardson, hoping they can upgrade the productivity Jason Williams and Barnes, respectively, gave the team last year.
Additionally, the Magic extended the contracts of Smith and head coach Stan Van Gundy for the second consecutive summer, providing both with more job security. The extension for Smith also includes a new title: President of Basketball Operations.
The biggest personnel move didn't involve the addition of a new player, but rather the retention of a current one. Convinced that reserve shooting guard J.J. Redick has turned a corner in his NBA career, Smith matched the offer sheet to which the Chicago Bulls signed him in July, retaining his services for the next three seasons. Redick set career-bests in scoring (9.6), rebounding (1.9), assists (1.9), minutes (22) and True Shooting (60.6 pecent) last season while leading the team in fourth-quarter scoring, although the ever-modest Redick attributed the last fact to the Magic's tendency to blow teams out. He also has earned the admiration of the coaching staff.
Moving Foyle to a player-development role will also have an impact. Foyle has the respect and trust of many of the Magic's players, including franchise center Dwight Howard, who said last season that a chat he had with Foyle inspired him to become more of a leader.
Please make the jump to finish reading the discussion of offseason moves. Other topics discussed later include strengths, weaknesses, and a predicted record.
In the bigger picture, the most significant move happened off the court, due to something that kept happening on it when the Boston Celtics ended their season in the Eastern Conference Finals. Indeed, the Magic have tried to become more focused and mentally tough this season. "[Toughness]," Redick said during Media Day, "[is] a big reason why Boston beat us." The team has abandoned its pregame "Magic Show" exhibition during warm-ups. And Howard has vowed to take a more businesslike approach on the court, a topic which Jeff Zillgitt of USA Today covered in greater depth here.
The Magic set the tone for their season in a three-and-a-half-hour meeting the day before training camp. Though the coaching staff and GM Otis Smith were in attendance, the players did most of the talking, and discussed accountability. Every player has a role to fill, and it's up to him to fill it. It also means knowing every other player's role, and holding those players accountable when they aren't holding up their end of the bargain. One of the big stories to come from this meeting, it seems, is word that the Magic desperately want Carter to play the way he always has, rather than trying to fit in. I asked Carter to elaborate on that point:
[Van Gundy] just wants us to be aggressive. He wants me to play my game. That's what I do. I can post up, I can get to the basket and just make plays. And that opens up everything else throughout the rest of the game. I try to set the tone. That's kind of been my goal, to kind of set the tone [by] just being aggressive.
What are the team's biggest strengths?
The most obvious strength is defense. Howard, the two-time Defensive Player of the Year Award winner, anchors it all, but it's Van Gundy's schemes from the bench that have elevated this team to the elite on that side of the ball. Orlando gives up on offensive rebounding to limit its opponent's transition opportunities, a strategy that's proven remarkably effective. Additionally, the team emphasizes chasing shooters off the three-point line, forcing opponents to take long two-point jumpers as a result. Numerous statistical analyses have proven that this shot is the least efficient in the game, which explains why Van Gundy stresses the importance of yielding it first.
Which brings me to another strength: preparation. Van Gundy is committed to data, and the Magic have spent money to start an analytics department in order to provide him and his staff the best possible scouting resources. He has become renowned--on the blogosphere, if not in the mainstream media--for his exhaustive pre-game messages on the locker-room whiteboard. Having seen some of these whiteboards for myself, I can assure you that the accounts of their impressive depth are indeed accurate.
Replacing Barnes with Richardson is a clear signal that the team prizes outside shooting. In the Conference Finals, Boston exposed a weakness in the Magic's offense by refusing to guard Barnes on the perimeter, as it rightfully didn't respect his jumper. They won't have that luxury with Richardson, a career 35.9 three-point shooter. Indeed, the addition of Richardson gives the team two above-average three-point shooters at every position except center.
Depth should also be a strength. We touched on Redick already, but he is hardly the only asset here. Marcin Gortat has proven an effective defender and rebounder when Howard heads to the bench, and while Duhon is a bit overmatched as a starter, he projects to be an above-average backup who can keep the offense moving when Jameer Nelson is unavailable. Mickael Pietrus, the team's best perimeter defender, also comes off the bench. Youngsters Ryan Anderson and Brandon Bass, who are skilled enough to start on plenty of teams, will fight for backup power forward minutes.
What are the team's biggest weaknesses?
Barring some sort of minor disaster, Orlando will once again rank among the league leaders in offense and defense. But there are a few issues on both sides of the ball in which Orlando is deficient.
Perhaps the biggest issue, on either side, is shot-creation. The Magic traded for Carter in the hopes that he could generate offense for himself against the league's stiffest defenses. He didn't prove to be quite up to the task. Though he's still physically gifted enough to get shots off against almost any sort of pressure, and intelligent enough to not commit too many turnovers, the shots are rather low-percentage. Perhaps not coincidentally, the Magic have worked throughout training camp and in the preseason to add new facets to their offense, which means more post-ups for perimeter players like Carter, Richardson, and Lewis; as well as running some cut-driven, read-and-react offense through the elbows.
Carter, for his part, worked out intensely this summer and trimmed 3 percent of his body fat. When one writer asked Carter after one preseason game what his mentality is for this season, Carter said, "Finish the job. It's about as simple as that."
Defensively, the Magic don't force many turnovers. It's the cost they pay for staying at home, as it were; better to stay in front of their men and force a bad shot than to gamble for a steal, miss, and give up an easy one. Yet it would be interesting to see what this team could do if it took a few more risks defensively, particularly in situations in which it needs a quick basket.
Losing Barnes may weaken the team's defense slightly, though Pietrus is still the team's top perimeter defender. If Lewis indeed plays more minutes at small forward, which looks to be the case, he'll have to work especially hard on defense, as guarding that position has never been one of his strengths.
What are the goals for this team?
Retaining Redick and signing Duhon, Richardson, and Orton came at a price of over $14 million in salary this season alone, bringing the Magic's total to over $93 million this year and over $281 million the next four years. The DeVos family isn't spending that money, which doesn't account for luxury-tax payments, to win one or two playoff series. The clear, not-at-all-ambiguous goal for this team is to win a championship. That attitude starts at the management level and has worked its way down. Smith has said numerous times, regarding this season and prior ones, that anything less than a championship will constitute a failure.
Predicted Record: 62-20.
Frankly, I don't see how the team could possibly have declined. It led the league in point differential despite getting only two above-average months from Carter and Nelson, and never getting any consistent production from Lewis. This NBA season, in terms of attention and coverage, will belong to the Miami Heat. I don't think anyone will dispute that point. But in their shadow, I believe the Magic will modestly improve upon last season's record, and enter the postseason more prepared to take on all comers than they were last season.
54 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
hell ya
our depth, the addition of Q (who will make those open 3’s that Barnes couldn’t), Dwight’s progress, and Vince Carter’s hunger will hopefully be enough to beat the Heat, Celts, and Lakers
The "East" is a beast this year...
…but (on paper) the Magic appear to be a better team in basically every way over last year. Additional outside shooting, better depth, more experience in the system for everyone, and the new attitude coupled with what seems like a level of fitness through the roof.
by The BBQ Chicken Madness on Oct 13, 2010 1:26 PM EDT reply actions
I'm currently reading 7 Seconds or Less by Jack McCallum which documents one of the Phoenix Suns' seasons
There is a passage where somebody was complimenting Marc Iavaronni for writing up game plans on the whiteboard. When Eddie House was asked if that was the best board he has seen, he remarked something along the lines of, “Well, no disrespect because this is a nice board, but being completely honest, Stan Van Gundy had one hot board.”
Even though the Hippopotamus lacks a stinger for a tail, a truly wise man would rather be sat on by a bee. ~ Banacek
by funny80sguy on Oct 13, 2010 2:18 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Thats about what i'm predicting but I dont know 62 if this is enough to win division
I expect Dwight to have his best season of his career in be the MVP race and I hope vince plays better and rashard scores like what he did his 1st 2years and that jameer’s healthy all season. The bench will very good. I confident they can beat the heat.Magic always play well against lebron if we hold him to 20 points and shut bosh down a little I think thats how you beat them.
regular season record is kinda irrelevant anyways
our home court advantage didnt really help in the boston series all that much
its all about who plays the best in the playoffs
cavaliers had the best record in the league the last two seasons and what did that get them?
Agreed
I don’t really care what their record is: 57 – 25, 60 – 22, whatever.
Being able to put all that depth to good use is crucial to winning it all. That could mean losing some games early in the season while we experiment with line ups.
Glad to see SVG has made a commitment to versatility so early in the (pre)season, and I hope it continues.
Magic might hold Lebron
But Wade likes to put 40 pts on the board against the magic
LETS GO HEAT!!!!!!!
Joel Anthony is the man
Henne please don't be good be Great
I seem to recall LeBron having a few 40-point games against the Magic.
In the ’09 playoffs. You know how that one ended.
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
But Wade did the same thing... and he has the Magic's number
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
by ben_gleicher on Oct 13, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions
The only confidence I have is that they can't guard the Magic either.
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
by ben_gleicher on Oct 13, 2010 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Eh.
I feel like 90% of the time, that kind of “X has Y’s number” stuff is due to flukes. Especially with a player like a shooting guard, who’s defended by all kinds of different people and schemes.
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
Certain players like playing certain teams, or playing in certain arenas
Dwyane Wade is 30/5.5/6.5 vs. Orlando and shoots 52% for his career. Over 21 games. Not a fluke.
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
by ben_gleicher on Oct 13, 2010 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions
"In certain arenas" is DEFINITELY a fluke.
There’s no park effect in basketball.
And really, how far are those stats you quote from Wade’s career averages?
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
How is it a fluke if we see it happening year after year?
PPG +4.5
FG% +4%
Min +0.8
And his turnover rate dips slightly.
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
by ben_gleicher on Oct 13, 2010 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Orlando routinely goes the route of "let the superstar attempt to beat us by himself"
for the most part, it has worked beautifully lately.
Ok, you could argue that this "strategy" inflates the numbers. But obviously they're not going to let Bosh/Wade/James beat them by "themselves"
When there’s more than one that whole plan goes to shit.
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
by ben_gleicher on Oct 13, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions
I mean park effect.
As in it’s not “Wade plays well against the Magic”, which is possible but might be a fluke. It’s “Wade plays well at the O-Rena (for reasons having nothing to do with the Magic specifically)”, which is silly.
You said “playing certain teams, or playing in certain arenas”. The former is arguable, though I don’t think we’ve seen anything from Wade that couldn’t be explained by a few good games. (Anyway, how many opposing SGs and how many defensive schemes has he faced in that time? The Magic of today have nothing to do with the Magic of five years ago.) But if Wade does well against the Magic’s schemes, that’ll happen in Orlando, or in Miami, or anywhere.
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
Oh, and Arenas was fined for faking an injury
Such a good character. He just wanted to help Nick Young.
lol I saw that on Yahoo.
What a classy guy. Haha. Thank goodness we didn’t trade for him.
I'm a girl too.
Haters gonna hate.
At one point my overoptimism led me to believe at a 65 kind of season but
frankly, I don’t really care about the record this year, only about the ring. This team has shown a “Dr. Jekyll/Mr Hyde” kind of personna in the past but I agree with Ben’s point that there is no reason at all not to be better than last year. I can hardly wait to see the team unfold and the sense that everyone has a chip on the shoulder going into the season is a good one to have hanging in the air.
Don't mind my spelling. I'm a Typo Master.
Excellent article!
I am really “stoked” if
- Dwight really does have a sustainable NEW ATTITUDE and cuts out the pre – game and during – game crap
- if Vince is really fitter and works his butt off to stay that way through the season
- if Rashard comes to play EVERY game (at the 3)
- if Jameer copies Dwight’s new attitude and does not high five the opposing superstars prior to the game – just after we have beaten their asses and improves his distribution of the ball
- if Q replaces the toughness that left this team when Barnes departed
Oh well – one can dream – but I do think that something MAGIC might take place this year!!
Before I finish reading this, I just wanted to share that I was drinking milk when I saw "Adonal Foyle" under "Key Losses" and I literally projectile-laughed milk out of my nose onto my laptop.
So thanks for that, lol. And who knows if we shall be able to fill he role this year. His tremendous contribution (to the layup line, on occasion) will be missed. I will now read the rest of the post and go from there.
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
I know, it was just a gut reaction... didn't see it coming. I was then prepared for Malik Allen as a key addition though.
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
by ben_gleicher on Oct 13, 2010 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Well done, very thorough. Random musings...
The Magic don’t want Vince Carter to play like he has throughout his career though, contrary to what they keep saying. They want him to eliminate fadeaways and off balance shots, but that’s what he’s always done. So really what they’re asking is to be less of a natural scorer, more fundamental and less flashy. He had a bad season across the board last year, and people forgot how often he can make those. It’s part of what he does. Is it “settling” every time he takes a jump shot? Is every shot that isn’t a layup or dunk a bad shot?
The Magic’s approach to spending is the right one, and few teams do it the right way. Pay the right players what they’re worth and recognize the value of continuity, regardless of the tax. That’s what they’ve done. You get out what you put in. Teams that spend for spending sake… pay one star but let the budding star walk (half-ass it)… or have Michael Heisley as their owner…. will never win.
“The Magic Show” should have been a “key loss.” Regardless of a change in attitude, they could still afford to do a few sick dunks for the fans prior to the game (let me know if I have just missed them.)
I don’t think Dwight Howard needs a jump shot, that belief is widespread on this blog… but he does if he wants to beat Boston or Los Angeles. The Magic could roll over the other 27 (ok 26) teams without it, but with Perkins/Garnett/O’Nealz & Bynum/Gasol, he’ll have to be more dynamic.
I’m looking to JJ to close the toughness gap this season.
And the sooner they pull the trigger on that Arenas trade, the better.
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
Almost every CONTESTED shot that isn't a layup or dunk, and doesn't result in a foul call, is a bad shot.
There are a couple guys who can make mid-range jumpers over people at a sufficient rate to make it worthwhile. Paul Pierce comes to mind. Durant and LeBron. Vince isn’t that guy any more, as the stats show.
An open three is the best kind of shot outside the paint, and Vince can get plenty of open threes. Instead, he’s driving the lane halfway to take a shot which has pretty much the same raw percentage as an open three… but it’s a two!
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
Paul Pierce went through a pretty rough slump from the mid-range area not too long ago and no one told him to stop shooting.
Just because Vince had a horrible start to the year doesn’t mean he can’t shoot. If you looked at Vince’s 16-23 foot splits last year you’d see that the first 3 months of the season were an anomaly. The rest of the year he was excellent.
And he wasn’t turning down open threes to take contested twos.
Scarlett Van Carter. I might name my daughter this.
by ben_gleicher on Oct 13, 2010 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't want to see him drive INTO players.
What percentage did he shoot from 16-23 feet in the second half? If it’s not over 50%, it ain’t worth doing.
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
Not to be a pain, but
What makes an addition or loss “key”? I mean if everything that ever happens to the Magic is key, what’s the point of labeling it that? For example, I hardly see how Foyle retiring is a key loss.
Anyway great writeup, just something that’s bothering me.
by BlueSkyOneCloud on Oct 13, 2010 10:01 PM EDT reply actions
Ooops
Haha, didn’t read all the comments before posting this. Glad to see I’m not the only one wondering…
by BlueSkyOneCloud on Oct 13, 2010 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with this assessment in principle.
But suggest a complementary write up to finish the SWOT analysis by expanding on opportunities and threats. Considering the offensive improvement of close opponents, I tend to differ on whether the team has improved compared to last year. It is debatable whether or not we lost to BOS due to our offensive deficiency (Barnes’ shooting) or not being able to control Pierce (specific offense versus defense comparison). With MIA this year, are we inclined to contain James and Wade defensively or better offense (Richardson for Barnes) would be a strength point to offset weaker defense as it relates to starters (Pietrus does not count in this regard)? While these points are open to debate, I tend to believe that considering the threat of stronger offensive opposition, this team is a notch below last year’s. Additionally, I consider the idea of wait and see how the market develops (Smith’s stated approach last summer) counter-productive. He was also reactionary in re-signing Reddick which caused to pay higher for him as compared to making an acceptable offer early on.
I considered improvement in a vacuum. Even if they don't win more games--I think they will, but if they drop to, say, 54 wins--they'll be a better /team/ based on their personnel.
by Evan Dunlap on Oct 14, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I am not basing my argument on the number of wins.
In fact, it makes sense to predict that based on the lower productivity from some key players last year – compared to expected productivity -, we may win more games this year. However, the crux of my argument is that when it comes to playing the main opposition – with championship or bust in mind – we seemingly need more defense but our personnel selection went the opposite direction. That is, within starters in particular, we brought in Richardson (better offense) to replace Barnes (better defense). The rest is a wash assuming that Duhon is an upgrade compared to Williams which still needs to be tested. Williams looked pretty good at stretches last year although towards the end ran out of gas. Duhon, thus far, did not look good in running the team, and he is a poor shooter.
I think Duhon's defense will be an asset though. It's hard to be worse than Williams on that end.
He tries, and gives a good effort, but he has to play so far off his man to compensate for his lack of lateral mobility, and as a result isn’t able to really make things tough for an opposing PGs.
And I'm willing to bet QRich can be approximately as effective as Barnes on D. That is, I don't think there'll be a steep drop-off.
How so?
The Celtics repeatedly struggled on offense against the Magic last year. They did break through in a couple games, but that wasn’t the general case. The Magic’s problem was scoring on the Celtics, not keeping the Celtics from scoring.
And anyway, given that Pierce led their offense in the playoff games where the Celtics WERE effective, I don’t think replacing the guy who guarded Pierce would lead to any kind of drop-off.
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
Were we watching the same games?
I tend to differ with you on the first paragraph of your post. As for the second paragraph, granted that Barnes was struggling against pierce – he was supposedly playing hurt – would that be OK to replace him with whomever regardless of their prowess?
The numbers support me on the first half.
To the extent that this is not even a valid argument in my opinion. Both teams were well below average on offense in their head-to-head meetings.
As for the second half, we’re not talking about “whomever”. We’re talking about a guy who, both statistically and by reputation, is an above-average defender. Yes, Barnes has a reputation as a lockdown defender (a reputation that the stats don’t reflect so much), but NBA fans believe a lot of superstitious, insupportable, or otherwise bogus things.
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
You lacked logic in the first place, and then made it worse continuing to argue
Do you contest the general belief that Barnes is better than Richardson defensively? If you do, this discussion is senseless, and if you don’t, you have no grounds to stand on.
Yes, I contest that.
Since the general belief is that Barnes is a great defender and Richardson is a lax defender. The gap is not as great as the general consensus makes it out to be. In fact, I won’t be surprised by the end of the season to see QRich’s numbers equal or surpass Barnes’ from last season. Especially against the stronger, beefier SFs like LeBron and Pierce.
Please don't simply ignore the stats when making your case, 'cause "...your eyes lie to you sometimes..."
Stats Education::
Advanced Stats 101 @ MBN | Basketball Reference | Basketball Prospectus | 82games
by magicfaninTN on Oct 15, 2010 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm not sure
I think Q is probably a better post defender since he’s stronger, but moving laterally, being a nagger, staying on his man, all that?
I don’t remember Pierce torching us in the post. However, LeBron is going to be a problem and Q is probably better on him than Matt.
I am looking for a straight answer as to who is better defensively.
The numbers are out there for both players, and certainly have some share in forming the general belief. You may guess as you wish, but it should have no bearing on the current state of how thing are.
I’m saying “the general belief” is not “the current state of how things are.” In fact, “the general belief” has no authority as a basis for an argument. “The general belief” is a bunch of fans making up stories.
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
Here's what I'm saying.
You’re saying that the common belief is that Barnes is a better defender than Richardson.
I’m saying the common belief isn’t relevant. The common belief doesn’t go out there and defend guys. The players do that.
Barnes was a solid defender, but the stats suggest that he never deserved ALL the reputation he got… which came as much from picking fights with people and trash-talking as it did as from actually preventing the opposing team from getting good shots. I wouldn’t go so far as to say he was a liability on D… he was solid.
Richardson, by contrast, doesn’t have much of a reputation as a defender one way or the other. But the numbers suggest he might actually be pretty good at perimeter D. It’s hard to say what state his defense is in, given the Knicks’ defense, of course.
But “the general belief”, i.e. hype and reputation, has no effect on the outcome of the change.
Unless, of course, it takes playing time away from Ryan Anderson.
Can't wait to see Howard's new approach to his game
There was a nice article in the sports section of the Las Vegas paper (I’m here on vacation) about how much more focused and intense he is going to be, and how Hakeem Olajuwan worked with Howard this off-season. No more pre-game dance routine, humming songs from the foul line, half-court shots during pre-game, or goofing around with opponents for D12.
Also, I went to see the Lakers/Kings pre-season game at the Thomas and Mack Center Wednesday night (I was the only one in the place wearing an Orlando Magic shirt), which the Lakers won 98-95. Former Magic Matt Barnes was very impressive for the Lakers, as he had 8 points on 3 of 4 shooting, 4 rebounds, 3 assists, a steal and a block in just 18 minutes of action.
I’m in agreement that Quentin Richardson is a better fit for the Magic on offense than Barnes because of his better long-range shooting, but the Magic will certainly miss all the intangibles that Barnes brings to a team.
I also believe the Magic will finish with a better record than last season, and that should get the ready for what promises to be a very challenging playoffs.
"Bear Down, Chicago Bears"...
Chicago Blackhawks... 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Champions
Orlando Magic... 2009 NBA Eastern Conference Champions
by Mike from Illinois on Oct 14, 2010 4:22 PM EDT reply actions
Add to Barnes' stats:
Plus one [unnecessary] kerfuffle with Carl Landry and a cheerleader. Not sure I’ll miss those kinds of intangibles.
Please don't simply ignore the stats when making your case, 'cause "...your eyes lie to you sometimes..."
Stats Education::
Advanced Stats 101 @ MBN | Basketball Reference | Basketball Prospectus | 82games
by magicfaninTN on Oct 15, 2010 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions

by 














