Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Tim Povtak of NBA FanHouse reports the Orlando Magic will sign restricted free agent point guard C.J. Watson to an offer sheet sometime this weekend. The Golden State Warriors will have up to one week to match the offer.

If the name is familiar to you, it could be because Eddy identified Watson as a potential trade deadline target for the Magic way back in January.

over 2 years ago Minimalistchalksquare_tiny Evan Dunlap 117 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Interesting...a young, solid player

A pretty good three point shooter. Sounds like he might supplant AJ as the backup maybe?

by Lee for three on Jul 17, 2009 6:38 PM EDT reply actions  

If Watson were to sign, I think it's entirely feasible to see him evolve into the primary back-up ..

.. once Dad’s reign with the Orlando Magic comes to an end.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 17, 2009 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

With his 3 point %

He should be the primary back-up and let Dad chill.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 17, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

If GSW declines to match the offer, then Orlando might have gotten a steal

He’s not much of a passer (15.6 assist rate) but he’s a damn good shooter (career 39% on three-pointers).

And he’s 25! A potential, long-term backup to Jameer Nelson.

It almost makes too much sense to be true.

by Evan Dunlap on Jul 17, 2009 6:38 PM EDT reply actions  

I love it..

What are the chances GSW don’t match?

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 17, 2009 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be suprised if they didn't

They have Monte Ellis, Steph Curry, Speedy Claxton, and Acie Law. All of those guys can play the Point.

by ggrant on Jul 17, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but it's all part of Don Nelson's plan

To have a 12-man rotation made up of only guards.

by Lee for three on Jul 17, 2009 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hard to tell

They already have 12 players with guaranteed contracts, plus Watson’s RFA rights, plus 2 guys (Jermareo Davidson and Anthony Morrow) on non-guaranteed deals. And they have a ton of point guards, so they might not want to keep yet another one around if it’s too pricey to do so.

Then again, Watson is a great 3-point shooter, and the Warriors could try to finagle a way to cut salary (Speedy Claxton buyout?) in order to keep him.

His agent met with Warriors GM Larry Riley on Monday to discuss their future plans. Not sure how that shook out.

by Evan Dunlap on Jul 17, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

GS is a terrible team.

It sounds about right for them to match. It would be a bad idea with their current depth, so it will probably happen. Plus, isn’t Donnie Nelson (GM of the Mavs) the son of Don Nelson (HC of GS). Karma is cruel and payback is a b!tch. I won’t get my hopes up until we sign him and they decline to match. For the record, I wanted CJ before he went to the Spurs summer league team.

Life's too short. Be a fan. Magic, Cards,Rays and "the U"! What a winning combo.

by hevchv on Jul 17, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think the Warriors would match, but .. I really don't know with Golden State.

It’s hard to predict Nellie.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 17, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

With

Clax, Curry, and Law I think there is a chance.. I would value Watson over Clax though.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 17, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Duh, anyone would.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

GSW PGs and do they match the offer for CJ?

First the non-CJ players:

1. Monta Ellis is #1
2. If you listen to the press releases, lottery pick Stephen Curry might be #2….hard to tell after the way he played in Vegas.
3. Speedy Claxton is the cost of getting rid of Jamal Crawford and is probably expiring contract trade bait. Don’t see him in the rotation.
4. What Acie Law offers is open for debate, but we need to acknowledge that he was a rookie at Atlanta—whose coach either does not or cannot develop young players. He was a #11 pick in 2007. So there is still a lot of upside to him as a player. Will the GSW system give him a chance to develop?

So, it is open for debate whether CJ would be the #2 or #3 or #4 option. Some GSW fans think Nelson loves CJ and would be inclined to match for that reason.

The rest of our MLE doesn’t put the offer out of range for GSW to match unless we offer a lot of years on the deal. In which case, I could see GSW taking their chances with Acie Law and letting CJ go in order to maintain payroll flexibility in the future.

But, Ellis, Curry, Claxton, and Law are all already signed to a team with a 13 players on the roster already under contract.

It plays to our advantage that CJ is a RFA. I think we are putting GSW on the clock to find a deal to trade CJ, Law, and/or Claxton for some other piece they need. If they don’t find trade partners in the 7-day window, then IMO our chances of getting CJ go up.

by magicfaninTN on Jul 18, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Given those parameters, I doubt the Warriors sign.

But who knows with them.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

they will probably sign him and then go sign Wafer to complete their guard rotation.

by D-RAK on Jul 18, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who, Orlando?

That won’t happen.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haven't heard about this at all

But love it if it’s true. Otis you shrewd SOB

"It's difficult to win when you're outscored in every quarter." -Bill Walton

by betterthanburke on Jul 17, 2009 6:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Typical Otis, hah .. don't hear anything until the last minute.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 17, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Otis uses the trade exception to obtain Al Harrington or Stephen Jackson, we will know for sure

Even though the Hippopotamus lacks a stinger for a tail, a truly wise man would rather be sat on by a bee. ~ Banacek

by funny80sguy on Jul 17, 2009 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Touche.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Off the top of my head, I remember GSW matched the Clippers' offer sheet for Kelenna Azubuike last year

And they overpaid drastically for Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins, in addition to needlessly extending Stephen Jackson’s deal.

They’re not the most frugal of franchises, in other words. And perhaps they would be willing to keep Watson in the fold, even if the price is on the high side.

by Evan Dunlap on Jul 17, 2009 7:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Perhaps.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 17, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Azubuike

Is a nice player, but barried on the bench.. Why not trade him??

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 17, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah he is not buried on the bench

especially now that they are planning on starting Jackson at the 2. Kelenna is going to get the SF spot i believe

by Souwantmyname on Jul 17, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

My buddy

Hates steven jackson says GSW will not win with him

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 17, 2009 10:55 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Chances are,we're not goign to match it.

We have tons of guards fighting for playing time and I don’t think Watson can fit in there.

by Curry on Jul 17, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

He’s a Mo Williams w/class

by D-RAK on Jul 17, 2009 7:24 PM EDT reply actions  

LOL

Mo Williams is classless. LOL

by ggrant on Jul 17, 2009 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barnes said he wants to play for a contender, Daniels looks like he’s Bean town bound
so I think that would leave us and Cle. He would be brons backup not a lot of mins.+ I heard he wants to be in warm weather. I still think the chances of getting barnes is pretty good.

I like CJ think hes a good fit or could be, but if GS matches, oh well I LOVE DAD
Otis is aiming high thats for shure.with the money he’s spending I thought we would have some of the summer leaguers filling the roster……ink theese guys and were gettin full!

by D-RAK on Jul 17, 2009 8:25 PM EDT reply actions  

"Aiming high"

That’s certainly one way to put it, yeah. Doesn’t appear to be settling for anyone.

by Evan Dunlap on Jul 17, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

incredible offseason for otis

i’d pencil him for exec of the year if not for the arms race going on around the league…never seen anything like it!

by Half-man Half-gortat on Jul 17, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Magic win over 60 games, Otis is a shoe-in

Then again, didn’t Danny Ferry win Exec of the Year? I rather Otis stay under the radar.

Even though the Hippopotamus lacks a stinger for a tail, a truly wise man would rather be sat on by a bee. ~ Banacek

by funny80sguy on Jul 17, 2009 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, the Denver executive did .. as he should have.

That was a well-deserved award for what the Nuggets pulled off.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

....

free agent Marquis Daniels will sign with the Boston Celtics for the team’s $1.9 biannual exception unless the Pacers are willing to work out a sign-and-trade deal with the Celtics

By Hoopsworld

by bumper64 on Jul 17, 2009 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't care for this at all.

Kid averaged barely one assist per ten minutes last year. Yeah, I know GS’s offense is a mess, but that’s just too low a ratio for me to credit to a system. This kid’s not a point guard.

He's currently two-thirds man, one-third amazing. Which, let's face it, is still a pretty good ratio.

by 3.3seconds on Jul 17, 2009 8:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, maybe that's just me.

I know a lot of teams get by without a true point guard, but it’s never been a thing I’ve liked to see. Anyway, we already have Johnson — I know we need a third legitimate point guard for injury insurance, because Johnson really can’t play more than 15-20 minutes. But as far as the backup position goes, is Watson an upgrade over Johnson? Unless Johnson goes into a shooting slump like early last year. I don’t see it.

He's currently two-thirds man, one-third amazing. Which, let's face it, is still a pretty good ratio.

by 3.3seconds on Jul 17, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe... but I'm not really sure how relevant that is.

The fact is, Johnson — despite that early-season slump — did what we needed from him on offense: he shot threes. At a 39% clip, to be exact. Sure, Watson’s usage ratio was higher — though this IS Golden State, so everyone’s usage ratio is higher. But I don’t think we need a gunner at backup PG. I think we need a distributor who happens to be able to shoot the 3. And that’s Watson.

(Moreover, I can’t imagine Watson currently possesses the ability to play responsibly in a system. Not saying he’s not capable of it… just saying he’s been playing playground ball for the last 2 years. He probably IS going to attempt a bunch of shots, whether or not he’s the best option.)

He's currently two-thirds man, one-third amazing. Which, let's face it, is still a pretty good ratio.

by 3.3seconds on Jul 17, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree, we do need a gunner.

We need to be able to put 5 players on the floor that are offensive threats. Teams help off of Dad on a regular basis. The team, in general, is prety good about moving the ball and making the extra pass. That’s all of the passing we need out of him. Vince can run the pick and roll, as long as Watson gets the ball up the court. He looks like a great fit. Garauntee he’s a lot faster than dad, and pushes the tempo a lot better too.

Side comment: Golden State is great at recognizing and developing talent. They’re just horrible at organizing a team approach to the game of basketball. They just throw a bunch of talented guys on the floor and tell them to run the ball.

by farfromfl on Jul 17, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's been playing playground ball because Nellie's system allows it.

You can rest assure that Van Gundy will reel in Watson’s talents.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

stats state atherwise 10/16 fg-2/4 3fg 16/16 ft 7 reb 9 ass 1 stl 38 points against a strong utah team clearly beat deron williams on a head to head this kid is for real had a couple of close calls for tripdub
he loves to play loose and constantly on the break, and he can d up he had 3 or 4 steals in a couple of games and not by playing the passing lanesstrait up manned up, and with the rigth guidance theres no cealling to this kid amazing piece for this team.

by f m on Jul 18, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Might miss on Barnes

But, I would take Wafer and CJ Watson over just Barnes.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 17, 2009 8:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Then give me Watson..

We have a solid back-up SG in JJ.. Dad is not the answer at back-up PG. I like the way Otis is thinking.

Jeremy Richardson will do.. 35% from the 3 point line, but shoots a worse FG%.. LOL and 50% from the FT line.. Ha…

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 17, 2009 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think those are comparable.

Even aside from the fact that I don’t like Wafer or Watson, how do they fill the same role as Barnes? Barnes is a SF; neither one of those guys can play SF.

He's currently two-thirds man, one-third amazing. Which, let's face it, is still a pretty good ratio.

by 3.3seconds on Jul 17, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Price tag

I am not sure what price they are commanding . My point was if we could get two for the price of one, it makes sense.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 17, 2009 11:09 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Can't get both. Only can get one.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 17, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

SHAQTIS

Matty just spent a season and a half with Shaq, You would think he would see his chances are way better here, without the big shaqapottumus slowing the team down.

by D-RAK on Jul 17, 2009 8:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Who was there when Meer went down? DAD
Who was there when Rafer pimp slapped eddie house? DAD
Who was there to give you uplifting soul crushig dunks just when you needed them?DAD
you gotta have DAD.

by D-RAK on Jul 17, 2009 9:19 PM EDT reply actions  

DAD Dunks

He did have some nice posterizations this year, props to DAD for still having the ups.

by hedoswimmove on Jul 17, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

SIGN CJ WATSON!!

Are you kidding me? In his 2nd season only, and at 25 yrs old still, he hit 45 fg% and 40 3pt%. I didnt see this player coming at all, but I really like him after reading the stats, scouting reports, and some looks Iv seen before. He has a really nice, fundamental shooting form so his %‘s dont seem to be outliers. He is JAMEER-LITE. This guy should be the primary backup. I hear he is a pesky defender, and his steal rate and FT rate is higher than normal + + + Great shooter off the dribble, he likes to slash to shoot closer in or drive, and is getting really good with PRs, as well as great catch-and-shooting. To be honest, despite GSW’s PG depth, they might match imo.

by derekk on Jul 17, 2009 9:28 PM EDT reply actions  

i agree

He makes sense. I don’t think GSW let’s him out of the door for free, especially since Orl isn’t going to break the bank for him. Probably pull a Gortat..

Too me he would be more important piece then Barnes. We can make up for the swing spots. God forbid something happen to Meer we would be back giving up pieces to find someone.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z

by Wmillion on Jul 18, 2009 11:35 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm with GSOM and yeah it doesn't sound right

for us to match because of our depth on the team
but i can tell you magic fans that he is a good player with a lot of passion and last year at moments was called “crunch time c” but you guys have dwight howard so you won’t need cj’s occasional clutchness lol………….good luck next year!

by deandres2k on Jul 17, 2009 9:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Does it matter in GS???

they can play with multiple PG’s because they don’t care about defense. I bet we see alot of Montae and Curry lineups and thus I bet we see alot of losses

by Souwantmyname on Jul 17, 2009 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

he’ goin to Indy ,he’s bad fit imo

by D-RAK on Jul 17, 2009 9:50 PM EDT reply actions  

E, Ben

I just read the write up on this at the Warriors SB Nation blog, and it looks like they’ve got a lot of negaitve comments attributed to you guys that I haven’t seen you make. I could be wrong though.

by farfromfl on Jul 17, 2009 11:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Could you clarify?

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I say sign him

daniels is a sell out he goes to boston for 1.9 i bet we offered a similar amount but i do like c.j watson and remember that 4 way trade we did, dint we get like a million dollars cant we use that to sign matt barnes
starters: howard, bass, lewis, vince, meer
bench: gortat, anderson, barnes, peaches, watson
can you smell a championship run???

by doublettoluca23 on Jul 17, 2009 11:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Daniels isn't a sell-out.

He was never going to come to Orlando.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which is good, imo

"It's difficult to win when you're outscored in every quarter." -Bill Walton

by betterthanburke on Jul 18, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep. I didn't think he'd be a good fit.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

vets, please

my only problem with the cj thing is that right now, other than Dad, our bench is quite inexperienced (anderson, jj, gortat, etc.). young guys don’t win championships. i’d prefer to round out the roster with some guys who have been there.

by pinthatd12 on Jul 17, 2009 11:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Inexperienced?

I don’t buy that argument at all. ‘Experts’ tried to use that to dismiss the Orlando Magic during the playoffs and it didn’t work, because the team was able to get to the NBA Finals despite being “inexperienced”.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

you know, even though you're disagreeing with my point

i’m going to agree with yours. at least the part of yours that i kind of agree with. i was annoyed throughout the playoffs (esp against boston) that the national media kept calling us a young team. yes, dwight is young and lee is young, but rafer, hedo and lewis are all serious vets and AJ and Pietrus got a lot of run as well. We were not that young of a team. And htis year we won’t be either.

everyone knows that you win in the nba with vets, not young guys. that is not really debatable, right? we have a pretty decent mix of both. personally, i’d prefer another vet (esp one with a lot of playoff experience), but i can see a legit argument that we already have enough time-hardened vets to win now.

by pinthatd12 on Jul 18, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

The notion that you win with vets instead of young guys is something work exploring.

.. from an empirical sense, I mean. I wonder if it’s true. Maybe I’ll ask Neil Paine to find out.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 19, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

that would be great, but come on, you do know what the answer to that is, right?

just take a look at the teams that have won it all over the past 20+ years — they are full of vets. the only team that comes to mind that you could make a decent case for as being relatively is the 2000 Lakers. they had young kobe (21) and relatively young shaq (28) and dfish (26), but those guys were surrounded by vets — horry (29), fox (30), shaw (34), harper (36). they had a good mix, but it certainly wasn’t a “young” team overall.

each of the other last 10 champs have been absolutely loaded with vets, and in each case almost all of the stars were vets. look at the last 3 — lakers, celtics and spurs. a couple young guys mixed in here and there, but highly veteran rotations overall.

by pinthatd12 on Jul 19, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

naaw vets

i believe we need to look for young guys so that are older players like vince, rashard , jameer and even dwight and patrick chewing can mentor them and make them better players i for one believe gortat became such a solid player thanks to having dwight around the same with c.j nelson and dad can mentor him…. we dont wanna be old like the celtics!!!

by doublettoluca23 on Jul 17, 2009 11:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Gortat is older than Howard.

I get what you’re saying, but .. just saying.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Magic fans, check this out and get excited!

Near the end of the season when the Warriors only had 7 healthy players, CJ played 39 minutes against the Jazz IN UTAH, and destroyed Deron Williams. CJ had 38 points, 7 rebounds, and 9 assists. He absolutely carried the team. Here’s the box score:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=290411026

He would be a GREAT addition to your team as a backup PG. I hope he goes to Orlando and gets a chance to win a title

by WeStillBelieve on Jul 18, 2009 3:06 AM EDT reply actions   2 recs

But

This is interesting indeed. But then again, it was at the end of the year where GS had no pressure and was playing a spoiler role. It is always easier to light up a scoreboard when you aren’t playing for anything.

by Eric9321 on Jul 18, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes, but

it was still in Utah which is one of the most difficult places to win, and CJ carried his team to the victory. Not bad for a backup PG on a contender

by WeStillBelieve on Jul 18, 2009 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

erivera7 and BQR

What’s up. I’m dying to hear ,along with so many others, any real info on Matt Barnes. I believe he is the key to completing the playing roster. He would be huge for us at a position of need, SF. If Cavs get him it would really suck.

by O-Town MagiCane on Jul 18, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Not sure where the Magic stand on Barnes right now

Their money will be tied up for a full seven days once Watson officially signs the offer sheet, during which time several free agents (possibly Barnes) will sign with new teams.

Sources told Orlando Magic Daily that Watson’s offer is the rest of the MLE, or $1.8 million. That’d leave the Magic with just a minimum deal to offer Barnes, who played for the minimum last season in Phoenix and (deservedly) wants a raise after posting career-best averages of 10 points and 5 rebounds a game.

It’s entirely possible that GSW will match and Barnes won’t sign anywhere, which would then enable the Magic to give him the MLE money they’re trying to give to Watson right now.

My gut feeling is that Barnes will sign elsewhere.

by Evan Dunlap on Jul 18, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

This.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I don't know

about this pickup. I guess it is decent for the money involved, but I would rather us go athletic on the defensive side of the ball. Jameer isn’t stopping anyone, AJ isn’t even able to stay BEHIND someone, it wold be nice to add a PG that cold perhaps throw some clamps on the little quick gards. From what I can tell, this guy has no defense whatsoever, speaking totally from what others have said of course.

by Eric9321 on Jul 18, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Don't sell Jameer and A.J. short on defense

They’re solid on D. Not, you know, All-Defensive First-Team or anything, but still above-average.

by Evan Dunlap on Jul 18, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you're off-based on Nelson's and Johnson's ability to play defense.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jameer isadequate on D but AJ got destroyed routinely

Rondo exposed AJ in the playoffs with his full court pressure. I bet alot of teams will do that exact same thing next year.

You have to take into account that SVG had problems with him as well as Alston. I just dont see Dad helping us next year

by Souwantmyname on Jul 18, 2009 1:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Johnson didn't get destroyed routinely.

.. Rondo is just a guy that’s too quick. It happens. It’s called a matchup problem.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 18, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hah.

I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.

"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone

by erivera7 on Jul 19, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

That 90% your talking about is OLD,SLOW, POINT GUARDS!!!

Does Derrick Rose have any trouble with Rondo? No

Does Jameer Nelson have any trouble with Rondo? No

Does Moe Williams have any trouble with Rondo? No

The key point is that if you have a fast pg that has good ball handling then you’ll be fine against Rondo. If you have a slower pg then Rondo can use his speed to stay in front of the PG and disrupt the offense. Seriously, if you can barely get the ball up the court against 1 guy then you shouldn’t be on a contender

by Souwantmyname on Jul 19, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Johnson has trouble with Rondo?

He averaged 0.75 turnovers per game against Boston last season.

Rose? 2.33 turnovers per game.

Mo Williams? 3.0 turnovers per game.

Apparently old and slow gets the job done better than young and careless.

"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"

by The Dark on Jul 19, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Come on you saw it with your own eyes in the playoffs..

I dont care what the STATS say. AJ could barely get the ball up the court on Rondo. Once he did the offense could get started until there were 14 seconds left in the shot clock. It was hard to watch AJ just get worked like that.

Also playoff intensity is alot different than regular season. Rondo didn’t play that way until the playoffs started

by Souwantmyname on Jul 20, 2009 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

We really need a SF with some height.

Barnes is that guy! If we don’t get a player with his size and skills then the Magic are not as deep as we think. Most of you count on Lewis at SF but that really does not make our offense better since the PF is who usually helps when the Magic pick & roll leaving Lewis open. Bass gives us versatility and a guy like Barnes would do the same. I’m sorry but if we don’t get a DECENT SF we are in trouble when it comes to depth at that position.

by O-Town MagiCane on Jul 18, 2009 4:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Minimalistchalksquare_small
Please Welcome Mike from Illinois to the OPP Writing Team
Images_small
Post-Game Recap: Magic 109, Wizards 103
Logo2_small
The Dwight Saga
Images_small
Post-Game Recap: 76ers 74, Magic 69

Recent FanPosts

Small
All Time Orlando Team
Small
Jameer: no more heroes please! Just efficient clutch execution.
Small
Peter Vecsey on Howard and Kobe conversation
Small
Dwight Howard and scoring volatility
Small
VOTE!!: Rondo, JO, Allen, 2 picks for D12 & Nelson
Aazpkmicmaanray_jpg_large_small
Poll: Who has the worse contract?
Small
Oh Jameer, Jameer, where hast thou gone?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Contact Us

General Twitter feed

Evan Dunlap, Managing Editor / Press Contact

Tiny Blogroll

Rather than include our complete blogroll in this space, we've decided to link to it instead. That way, you won't have to do as much scrolling. Enjoy.


Managing Editor

Minimalistchalksquare_small Evan Dunlap

Contributing Writer

Images_small Mike from Illinois