What to Expect from Jameer Nelson in the NBA Finals, If He Returns
Arguably the biggest story leading up to the NBA Finals between the Orlando Magic and the Los Angeles Lakers is the potential return of All-Star point guard Jameer Nelson to the Magic's lineup. Nelson tore the labrum in his right shoulder in a game against the Dallas Mavericks four months ago Tuesday. A little more than two weeks later, he underwent what was then termed a season-ending operation to repair the labrum. Now, he's several months ahead of his rehabilitation schedule. His team is four wins away from an NBA championship, and it appears as though he will play evetually during the series, although we stress that neither the Magic nor Nelson has made a formal announcement about his availability, one way or the other.
In light of his probable return, I thought it might be wise to run some numbers to try to get an idea of Nelson's effectiveness. This science is by no means exact. I do not know what difficulties a right labrum tear might present to a basketball player, even one who has recovered from the necesary surgery. What I'm assuming is that, whatever those effects are, they'll limit Nelson to 80% of his normal per-minute productivity this season. Next, I figured that he'd have 15.1 minutes per game with which to work. Rafer Alston, the starting point guard, averages 32.9 minutes per game in the playoffs. A 48-minute game--overtime is possible, but unlikely--leaves 15.1 minutes for his backup, which is the number to which I've applied Nelson's adjusted, per-minute stats. Again, "inexact" is a word I'd like to emphasize here.
One thing I did not adjust is shooting percentages or shot attempts, for lack of a great method by which to do so. Even if Nelson's accuracy bottoms out a bit, he'll still be far better than most NBA point guards: 50.3% from the field this season, 45.3% from three-point range. His true shooting percentage, which accounts for three-pointers and free throws, of 61.2% ranked him 3rd among point guards this season, trailing only Steve Nash and Jose Calderon.
Let's add another element to this exercise, though. One school of thought making its way around the NBA world is that a hobbled Nelson is an upgrade over Anthony Johnson, Alston's usual backup. To test this wisdom, I've applied Johnson's per-minute playoffs statistics, then adjusted them for 15.1 minutes per game to see how he'd stack up against Nelson.
| Player | Pts | Rebs | Ast | Stl | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson | 6.5 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Johnson | 4.4 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
If I'm right--and there's no guarantee I am--ceding Johnson's minutes to Nelson is little more than a lateral move. A.J. hasn't exactly set the world on fire in these playoffs, but he's at least been very steady. Will Nelson be similarly reliable, in his first NBA game in over four months, in the most meaningful playoff series of his professional career? As the Orlando Sentinel notes, Johnson has played in two NBA Finals before, losing twice as a member of the New Jersey Nets, so he at least has experience at this level. None of this is to suggest Jameer can't handle the pressure, as he's proven over the course of his professional and collegiate career that he can perform on big stages. Still, I can't help but think the NBA Finals is not exactly the right place to re-integrate such a crucial part of the team.
But, if he can return, and play more effectively than expected--more effectively than projected here--he could be the difference between the Magic winning and losing the series. He's hardly the only player on the floor, though. Rashard Lewis could just as easily prove to be Orlando's "X-Factor," as could Mickael Pietrus or Hedo Turkoglu. That's neither here nor there, though.
Ultimately, people are right to lower their expectations for Nelson coming off such a shoulder injury. Even the staunchest of Magic fans will understand that Jameer will not be in All-Star form if and when he plays in this series. What could be a misconception, as the numbers I crunched shows, is that Nelson is a significant upgrade over Johnson. It's a matter of tempering expectations, curbing enthusiasm.... whichever phrase you choose, the point remains the same. The point guard, however, will be different.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Interesting
I guess with those projections (which I know you said are inexact) it really wouldn’t be a big risk production-wise, being that the numbers are almost exactly alike. Also, if he is close enough to being a game-time decision, then the doctors obviously have given the okay, so the health risk is minimized a little.
Overall, the risks involved seem to have lowered a bit. But as you said, it’ll be best not to put any expectations on it.
by bandrewg08 on Jun 4, 2009 8:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Id rather not play nelson.. Johnson’s production is similar, and we dont need to risk jameer’s career like this.. One thing – jameer has been VERY injury prone during his career.. I mean, the guy has never played a complete season with the magic so far… Please dont return him and wreck the chemistry we already have!
by i2ambler on Jun 4, 2009 8:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I've been on the fence about this, but now
I’m starting to get very excited in regards to Jameer’s return. As much of a lift it could give to these guys emotionally (although SVG says they don’t need it) if ‘Meer didn’t play now, would it produce the same effect in a negative fashion? His teammates are all amped up thinking he’s coming back and then he doesn’t? We will see, but we’re in too deep now, give him some minutes, he’s earned it.
"Shoot first, ask questions last" Rafer Alston
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Jun 4, 2009 9:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think there will be a negative impact.
I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.
"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone
by erivera7 on Jun 4, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
unforseen factor???
Numbers aside, I believe something could work in our favor that numbers can’t project and most wouldn’t buy but here it is… As we all know Nelson has been sidelined for awhile, during that time he’s being observing and talking to officials, i’ve seen him doing it alot during games. I believe that Jameer (if he plays) would get some favorble calls, calls that frankly nelson has never gotten. I know, sounds crazy stupid but look guys i’m telling you all these refs know nelsons situation and they’ll kinda protect him unconsciously, it’s human nature. I’m already expecting 99.9% percent of you to dismiss this and i don’t blaim you but watch when he’s on the court…. Neslon could get some key guys in foul trouble this series……
by orltragic07 on Jun 4, 2009 10:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's a good point, it's a possibility
and we definitely deserve a call or two in our favor, the way this postseason has gone for us.
"Shoot first, ask questions last" Rafer Alston
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Jun 4, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nelson brings more than just his shooting though
He is phenomenal on pick n’ rolls, much quicker, and can run the offense at a quicker pace. I think there are lots of intangibles that push the debate in Jameer’s factor even at 80%.
'Coach, Dwight is a nice guy. Dwight don't hit anybody. But Superman will knock the crap out of you.' - D12
by Eyriq the Red on Jun 4, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
True, even if his shot isn't falling he's a good enough shooter
for the Lakers to respect him on offense, freeing up good looks to his teammates.
"Shoot first, ask questions last" Rafer Alston
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Jun 4, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, this was something I wanted to bring up as well.
I think there are certain intangibles, some of which you alluded to, that would theoretically tip the scale in Jameer’s favor if he were to play (I’m aware he won’t be). Another factor would be chemistry, as has been mentioned, and also the idea that Nelson’s presence would provide a ‘pick-me-up’ for the Magic.
.. that was something David Steele brought up when I interviewed him, which is a valid point.
I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.
"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone
by erivera7 on Jun 4, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All signs point to his return
I doubt their will be a formal announcement long before the game begins. To me, Jameer represents a guy who can pull this team for short stretches. If Jameer is on the court the Magic won’t be giving up 18 point leads. Even if he only plays 15 minutes, you can bet their will be a 3 minute stretch where he puts his team on his back.
Also, he represents a point guard who knows exactly what Dwight is thinking. Rafer and Dwight play well but the chemistry that Dwight has with Jameer and Turk isn’t there. It’ll be nice to see two different lob options on the court as opposed to just Turk.
One Freaken Second
by magic fanatic on Jun 4, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Also, I think he is still an upgrade over Johnson defensively.
Much, much quicker. But I doubt that will be too big of an issue given that the Lakers haven’t gotten that much offense out of their PG’s this playoffs.
"It's difficult to win when you're outscored in every quarter." -Bill Walton
by betterthanburke on Jun 4, 2009 12:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The only player I can see giving Johnson problems defensively is Shannon Brown.
.. but to counteract that possibility, don’t be surprised to see SVG play “THE” lineup to avoid that mismatch. The lineup that I’m referring to is Lee/Pietrus/Turkoglu/Lewis/Howard. Lee can cover Brown, no problem.
I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.
"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone
by erivera7 on Jun 4, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, we can bottle up these thoughts and throw them away since Jameer won't be playing.
Always good to think about the possibility from a theoretical sense, though.
I'm the other guy at Third Quarter Collapse, with a Twitter account.
"Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement." - Michael Corleone
by erivera7 on Jun 4, 2009 1:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















