Bobcats get Jackson
According to Yahoo! sports :
The Golden State Warriors traded Stephen Jackson to the Charlotte Bobcats in exchange for Raja Bell and Vladimir Radmanovic, two NBA sources with knowledge of the deal said Monday morning.
The trade also sends Warriors guard Acie Law(notes) to the Bobcats.
The Warriors rid themselves of a disgruntled player, who only two months ago served as the team’s captain, and gain payroll relief in the process. Bell’s $5.3 million contract expires at the end of this season while Radmanovic is due $13.3 million over this season and next, provided he exercises his option for 2010-11.
This FanPost was made by a member of the Orlando Pinstriped Post community, and is to be treated as the opinions and views of its author, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
I don't understand the trade but I don't care, as long as the Cavaliers didn't get Jax.
I write for Third Quarter Collapse and have a Twitter account. Like us? Please vote for 3QC in the Orbbies, Orlando's Rockin' Blogs, hosted by the Orlando Sentinel. We're nominated for the best Sports and Overall blog.
"The second unit is kind of crazy because the second unit is only white guys." - Marcin Gortat
by erivera7 on Nov 16, 2009 3:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It confuses me too, but I'll go with it
I understand GSW wanted to get rid of Jackson, since he was becoming a problem.
I understand GSW wanted a SF in return, since Azubuike’s hurt.
I understand Vlad Radmanovic isn’t a fair return for Jackson (although their salaries are within the spread)
I don’t get Raja Bell and Acie Law being the complementary pieces – the Warriors definitely don’t need Law, what with them having Claxton, Ellis, and Watson, but I wouldn’t have thrown Bell in as a Bobcats GM. I would have tried to sell them on Henderson or done a second deal of Law for trade exceptions (Charlotte has two for Dudley and Hollins worth a combined $2.19M), but I don’t see a third PG as a need for Charlotte with Augustin and Felton.
"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"
by The Dark on Nov 16, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eddy
They may just get S-Jax if only because they can give Charlotte what they want. Apparently Cleveland didn’t want to touch what they had (depending on who you ask—they are differing versions on this) to do this deal.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
by pookeyguru on Nov 16, 2009 10:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I hear the Cavaliers had the superior offer but the Warriors decided to "punish" Jax.
At least, that’s what I heard. Knowing Nellie, it’d make sense.
I write for Third Quarter Collapse and have a Twitter account. Like us? Please vote for 3QC in the Orbbies, Orlando's Rockin' Blogs, hosted by the Orlando Sentinel. We're nominated for the best Sports and Overall blog.
"The second unit is kind of crazy because the second unit is only white guys." - Marcin Gortat
by erivera7 on Nov 17, 2009 12:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, same here. Kinda goes with when GM Otis said something somewhat similar when GSW wouldnt deal Watson to us.
by derekk on Nov 17, 2009 3:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Different stories going around
Like that the Cavs wanted to trade Delonte West – but only if the Warriors agreed to release him so they could sign him back, meaning the Cavs would essentially get nothing but cap relief for Jackson, or that the Cavs wanted a first rounder thrown in.
I’m more concerned about the Bobcats moving him on to the Cavs than anything.
by eltharion_doa on Nov 21, 2009 7:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 















