Are Rashard Lewis And Jameer Nelson Deserving All-Stars?
Rashard Lewis and Jameer Nelson are heading to Phoenix to represent the Orlando Magic and the Eastern Conference in the 2009 All-Star Game, but do they deserve to go?
Less than 24 hours have passed since the All-Star reserves were announced, and as expected, many debates have started in trying to determine which players deserved a roster spot, which players got snubbed, etc.
One of the top stories in the aftermath of all the hoopla & news is that the Orlando Magic led the NBA with three All-Star bids (Dwight Howard, Rashard Lewis, Jameer Nelson), a franchise-most for Orlando. Arguments have begun, questioning whether the Magic, indeed, deserve to have three players sent to Phoenix. One of the main inquiries is whether or not Lewis and/or Nelson truly deserved the honor of being named an All-Star.
The answer is yes, and here's why.
Looking closely into the numbers, both Lewis & Nelson compare favorably to fellow All-Star hopefuls and representatives, specifically in the Eastern Conference.
I'm going to keep the comparisons simple for the purpose of this post.
Exhibit A: Rashard Lewis
I decided to compare Lewis to another All-Star player, Paul Pierce, from the Boston Celtics. If you enlarge the image beneath in a separate tab or window, you'll notice that Lewis' & Pierce's statistics are nearly identical across the board.
In case those stats aren't enough, Lewis' WARP (5.7) matches closely to Pierce's WARP (5.3). More numbers - Lewis is first on the Magic in net plus/minus per 100 possessions. Plus, despite popular belief, 'Shard isn't just a one-dimensional player. His defense is vastly underrated, especially given he's playing out of position.
Exhibit B: Jameer Nelson
I decided to compare Nelson to two point guards that competed with him for a reserve guard spot on the East roster - Rajon Rondo, from the Boston Celtics, & Mo Williams, from the Cleveland Cavaliers. As you can see below, Nelson out-rates both Rondo and Williams in a plethora of statistical categories. However, in the case of Rondo, both he & Nelson are neck and neck numbers-wise, a fact further fueled when comparing Rondo's WARP (7.5) to Nelson's WARP (5.5).
For Nelson & Rondo, it's a true toss-up between the two statistically but for Williams, he is a distant third nearly across the board and not much of a factor in this comparison.
Talks of Rondo being an All-Star snub are valid, but the same can't be said for Williams. A good player, no doubt, but not someone worthy of consideration for a roster spot in Phoenix (though Cleveland's Ben Wallace would disagree).
Both Lewis & Nelson, as you can see, earned their respective All-Star bids. Are there other players in the Eastern Conference that could have garnered a roster spot over either Lewis and/or Nelson? Sure, and their inclusion would have been warranted. But that doesn't make either Lewis or Nelson less deserving of the honor they received (two experts would agree with that sentiment).
0 recs |
27 comments
|
Comments
The argument has a lot to do with, "How can the league's fourth-best team have the most players in the All-Star Game?"
I don’t really buy that argument, though. Then again, if the Magic and the Cavs swapped records, and Dwight was the only Magic player on the team, and the Cavs got LeBron, Z, and Mo, we’d probably be pretty pissed.
To be honest, I’m shocked that Lewis made it. Ray Allen, Rajon Rondo, and Vince Carter are three guys who are probably having better seasons.
I guess I’m saying I understand the griping, but only to an extent. And I don’t understand hwo anyone can say, with a straight face, “Jameer Nelson is not an All-Star, but Mo Williams is.” As Basketbawful pointed out this morning, Williams’ stats are nearly identical to Allen Iverson’s, and he’s the one starter everyone complained about. And Williams is the third-best Cav, behind Big Z. So I don’t want to hear about how Mo got snubbed, because it’s only a snub if you deserve to be there in the first place.
Ray, Rajon, and Vince have a right to be upset, though.
by Ben Q Rock on Jan 30, 2009 12:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
When was the cut-off for coaches voting?
Because this time last week we had the best record in the NBA, when I’m sure a lot of the votes were coming in. Just a thought.
Sports Picks 365
"Shoot first, ask questions last" Jameer Nelson
by DieSlowKeyshawn on Jan 30, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Monday was the cut-off.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 30, 2009 3:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, that's another part of the argument but I wanted to concentrate solely on the point of whether or not Jameer Nelson & Rashard Lewis truly deserved to be All-Stars.
Again, a team’s record shouldn’t influence who’s an All-Star on the team or not. I just don’t buy that rationale, at all.
The only three players that were legitimate snubs in the East are Ray Allen, Rajon Rondo, and Vince Carter, as you pointed out Ben. I would have had no problem if any of them were selected over Nelson and/or Lewis. But again, I didn’t want to get into that ordeal because that’s not the point of this post.
The purpose of this article was to show Lewis & Nelson deserved their All-Star bids.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 30, 2009 2:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I pretty much agree with all the east selections
The West on the other hand, is a pretty botched roster. Shaq and David West make it but Melo and Jefferson don’t? Please.
Anyway, Jameer was a lock to make the team weeks ago. I haven’t heard a good case against him at all since the team became official. Rashard deserves to be there as well. He’s the most prolific three-point shooter in the league on a team that has burned the likes of LA, San Antonio, and just recently Cleveland.
IF, Big Z was healthy I would take Rashard off the team and bump Bosh to the foward spot. That would be the only scenario where Rashard wouldn’t deserve to make it.
by magic fanatic on Jan 30, 2009 12:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Shaq deserved to make it. West did not.
.. and I agree, had Big Z stayed healthy, he would have been a shoe-in as a reserve center on the East roster. Unfortunately, he went down with an injury and that opened things up a bit.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 30, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here, here. Very well put-across argument. There's no arguing with hard stats.
For the record on the West, Al Jefferson getting no love is terrible. The guy is an animal, whereas Amare, this year, has been nothing short of woeful.
Shaq, I believe may just scrape being just about worthy. A number of times, he’s turned back the clocks and shown that he is certainly still serviceable.
by big aaron on Jan 30, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Again, Shaq is worthy.
.. and he’s not just “scraping” by.
Minimum 300 minutes played:
PER (22.4) – 1st on team
Win Shares (4.4) – 2nd on team
ORtg (116) – 1st on team
DRtg (106) – 1st on team
Shaq is literally first in a TON of categories for Phoenix. The dude deserved a spot in Phoenix.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 30, 2009 3:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hollinger made a good point a few days ago about Jefferson putting up similar numbers... in nearly 500 more minutes played
by Ben Q Rock on Jan 30, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure.
But I think we can both agree here.
Jefferson > West.
No?
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 30, 2009 3:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lewis shouldn't be there.
ray allen should. simple as that.
www.last.fm/user/mhetrick04
by mhetrick14 on Jan 30, 2009 3:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
All-Star opinions...
"Lewis shouldn’t be there. Ray Allen should. Simple as that."
Based on what? Stats? Big shots? Team record? Because you’re a Celtics fan? Why Allen, and not Lewis?
Whatever case that can be made for Allen, can likely be made for Lewis. Although, as this article already pointed out, Lewis’s stats compare nicely to Pierce’s; who is arguably the Celtics best player.
I personally would have no problem with Ray Allen making the All-Star team. He is an All-Star. But that still doesn’t mean Lewis doesn’t deserve to be there, because he does.
You win some, and you lose some. Just like last year when many thought Hedo Turkoglu should have been there…
I think the team record should have some influence on who makes the team. The fact of the matter is there have been a lot of players over the years that have put up big, yet phantom numbers, on losing teams which has kept them from making All-Star teams. Players who put up big numbers on a horrible team just don’t deserve to be there in my mind. If they’re team is at or close to .500, I can buy it, but not if you’re team is at the bottom of the barrel. Corey Maggette comes to mind…
However, there can be exceptions…
Example: A case can be made for Al Jefferson. He is one of only three players this season averaging 20/10, and although their team record is only 16-28, they’ve been much improved 10-3 in the New Year.
"The only three players that were legitimate snubs in the East are Ray Allen, Rajon Rondo, and Vince Carter."
I’ll agree a case can be made for any of them, but how “legitimate”, I’m not sure…
I obviously think of Ray Allen as an All-Star, so there is no argument there.
As for Vince Carter, his stats make a case for him, but his teams 20-26 record doesn’t, especially considering he’s the second best player on the team. I’d be pissed if a team had two players in the All-Star game with a record like that. A team with two "legit" All-Stars should not have a 20-26 record; because their record says otherwise.
And then we have Rajon Rondo. I’ll admit, I’m not a fan. Now would I want him backing up Jameer Nelson, hell yeah, but is he an All-Star, no; not in my book anyway. I would have a serious problem if Rondo was on the All-Star team. He is a product of a lineup that has three multi time All-Stars, season MVP, Finals MVP, Defensive Player of the Year. When the game is on the line, Rondo isn’t even the Celtics forth option. He knows his role, and he plays is well, but in no way would I consider him an All-Star. Honestly, I’d pass on him for the fact that he still can’t shoot a jump shot… But that’s just me…
by OVERWADED on Jan 30, 2009 7:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I disagree that team record should play a factor in who should be an All-Star.
An All-Star is an All-Star, regardless of how a player’s team performs.
A plethora of examples can be made for my above statement .. Paul Pierce, Antawn Jamison, etc. At one point or another, each of these players were/are on a terrible team yet the perceived notion was/is that they weren’t/aren’t All-Stars because of their team’s performance, yet they put up nearly identical stats the years they did make the All-Star team to the years they didn’t make the All-Star team.
I can go on with that point, but I’ll save it.
As for dismissing Rondo simply because he doesn’t have a jump-shot is .. kind of foolish. You’re throwing out the window the fact he’s an excellent defender, etc. He’s first on the team in WARP (7.5), so he’s a pretty important part of the Celtics. He’s the engine that makes them go, just as it is for Nelson and the Magic. He’s worthy of being considered an All-Star.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 30, 2009 8:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
team record SHOULD play into it,
and ray allen has been the mvp of the best team in the league all season. there’s just no basis for the magic sending the most guys when we have the third best record in the east. i’m a huge, huge magic fan but the celtics are pretty clearly the best team in the league and if anyone is sending 3, it should be them.
rashard’s having a good/great year, i’m not arguing that.
www.last.fm/user/mhetrick04
by mhetrick14 on Jan 31, 2009 10:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Team record's are fluid & ever-changing.
Just recently, the Magic held the best record in the league. So have the Cavs.
I just don’t buy that argument that team record should play any role (a small one, at most) in determining which players are deemed All-Star worthy or not. Because of that “rule”, you have guys like Jamaal Magloire in the past making All-Star teams as opposed to Marcus Camby (who has NEVER made an All-Star squad). Just .. that doesn’t fly with me. Sorry.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 31, 2009 6:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the assist!
"An All-Star is an All-Star, regardless of how a player’s team performs."
"A great player is a great player regardless of which team he’s on."
I’m not sold on either of those statements. And I’m pretty sure they could be forever argued; something we will never do. Afterall, it’s only the All-Star game.
There are plenty of guys who have went out year after year, and put up great yet meaningless stats for losing teams, who where rarely considered All-Stars. Another name comes to mind; Juwan Howard. He’s a guy who put up more than solid numbers for over a decade, but they were mostly much meanlingless. I never thought of him as an All-Star (despite making it one season), or a great player (although he was paid like one); yet he had plenty of years of production in the NBA that says otherwise.
I’ll say this about Rajon Rondo. If he ever makes the All-Star team, I expect it to be a single nod, based upon a great team he is on, not because of the numbers he’s putting up. Although we’re hitting a contradiction now, because isn’t that what would have gotten him on the All-Star team this season? I mean honestly, would Rajon Rondo’s name being mentioned now had he not be on the Boston Celtics? Good luck convincing me of that one.
You did mention his defense though. Although, defense rarely lands guys in the All-Star game. It’s happened a few times, usually when a position is lacking depth. But it has happened… One time All-Star Horace Grant comes to mind. Two time All-Star Dennis Rodman also comes to mind. I don’t consider Rondo’s contributions to the Celtics anywhere near to what these players did though.
Thanks for the assit with Jamison. Antwawn Jamison is a perfect example as relates to how a team performs. His stats are nearly identaical to last seasons, yet last year they were a playoff team, and this year they are not. Was Jamison even considered for a spot on the All-Star team this season?
Want another example? You need to look no further than his teammate Caron Butler. Again, he’s putting up nearly identaical numbers to last season, yet again, another player that wasn’t even considered.
I guess they are both still considered All-Stars in your book?
The only difference from last season to this season is that their team sucks, whereas last season, they were a playoff team. So you’re going to have a tough time convincing me or many others that a teams performance shouldn’t be considered.
Lastly, I didn’t dismiss Rondo simply because he doesn’t have a jumpshot. Even if I think it’s embarassing that a point guard in the NBA that doesn’t have one… I never did dismissed him because of that though. I kind of remember making mention of umm, 3 future Hall of Famer teammates as to why he really isn’t an All-Star; rather the beneficary of being surrounded by them.
To me, Rajon Rondo is to Boston, what Derek Fisher is to the LA; neither I consider All-Stars. To me, they are both great role players; nothing more. Although Rondo is young, so he still has time to get better. But I would be surprised to see his game elevate to an "All-Star" level once KG, Pierce, and Allen are no longer surrounding him.
As for him being "the engine that makes the Celtics go". There have been plenty of those guys, Avery Johnson of the Spurs comes to mind. How many times was he an All-Star?
It’s a fun debate, and you are entitled to your opinion; but in my mind, KG is "the engine that makes the Celtics go" without question.
by OVERWADED on Jan 31, 2009 1:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
There's certainly exceptions to the rule.
For instance, there will be players that benefit statistically on a bad team. But if you place this type of player on a good team, he may not match his numbers. Again, that’s more of an exception.
More often than not, a great player will put up great stats regardless of his team. Plenty of players come to mind. However, I’m speaking in semantics .. it’s a personal opinion, as you’ve stated.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 31, 2009 6:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll add.
To compare Rondo to Fisher is .. an insult to Rondo. I’ll keep the numbers simple. Fisher’s best PER ever? 14.8, with Golden State in 2005. That’s roughly 5 points less than Rondo’s best PER ever, which is 19.2 (this year). AND he’s only 22.
Rondo has elevated his game this year, plain & simple. His PER is 2nd-best on the Celtics currently. Obviously PER paints just a small picture statistically, but it’s a decent idea of how good Rondo has been so far this season.
The question is, did Rondo deserved to be an All-Star this year? The answer is yes. It’s not because he’s a member of the Boston Celtics, though it helps. It’s because he legitimately deserved the honor. The stats don’t lie. His numbers were neck & neck with Jameer Nelson .. another deserving player.
Nothing else matters, in determining whether Rondo’s worthy of being considered an All-Star .. you can’t anticipate his impact on another team. You can only speak on the here and now.
I can go on, but I’ll save the rant.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 31, 2009 6:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree on rondo
dude should absolutely be there. i don’t care how many pg’s you have on the team, he deserves it (though i don’t think pierce does, as he’s having only a decent season by his standards).
www.last.fm/user/mhetrick04
by mhetrick14 on Jan 31, 2009 10:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't mind Pierce getting a bid.
Kevin Pelton stated that when he picked his reserves, he didn’t look solely at this season numbers but did take into a lesser account a player’s body of work for his career. I tend to agree with that sentiment, hence why I’m fine with Pierce getting an All-Star nod. Are there some players that deserve a spot over him? Sure, but he’s just as deserving, IMO.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Jan 31, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
at some point,
rather than just naming a bunch of people that are deserving, you have to start to take into account how many get in and actually have an opinion. paul pierce is not having his best season up to this point, and anyone around the celtics can tell you allen has been absolutely their mvp.
www.last.fm/user/mhetrick04
by mhetrick14 on Feb 1, 2009 11:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Every year, snubs happen because there's always more deserving people than roster spots available.
If you’re asking me who I felt SHOULD have been the reserves, I was fine with everyone except Lewis & Pierce. I would have replaced them both with Vince Carter & Ray Allen. Had he been healthy, Zydrunas Ilgauskas would have gotten in over Allen in my book.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Feb 1, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll add that although that's what I prefer, I don't mind Lewis & Pierce getting All-Star bids.
They were just as deserving.
Senior Writer for DePaul's Scout.com website
by erivera7 on Feb 1, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs























