Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How A Letter From Tom Coughlin Helped One Fan's Recovery

Reaction to the Trevor Ariza Trade from Around the Web

Positive Reactions from a Magic Perspective:

Wish I had more to tell you on this one. I trust Hollinger's analyses... usually.

Negative Reactions from a Magic Perspective:

Positive Reactions from a Laker Perspective:

Negative Reactions from a Laker Perspective:

  • None

Further Details on Cook and Evans:
Kurt from Forum Blue and Gold was kind enough to pass along insight about Cook and Evans via email. Here's what he wrote:

On Cook and Evans, well, let’s start with the better half of the deal for you. Evans is a good, solid NBA backup two guard. He’s got a nice jumper and can hit the three if you give him a little room (35% career three and 36% last season). He’ll also give you a spectacular dunk or two this season, he’s more athletic than his game shows. He’s a good defender and plays well within a team system. Really, just a professional guy off the bench who has thrived in Detroit and in LA this year as part of a strong group off the bench.

Brian Cook is the Lakers fans whipping boy this season, and fans see his departure as a matter of addition by subtraction. On the bright side he can shoot the jumper and from three — it’s an ugly flat shot but he hit 40% from deep last year. Now, if you expect him to do a lot of rebounding, well, you’re out of luck, he gets some because he’s tall (5.7 per 40 minutes so far this season) but his heart isn’t in it. On defense you might as well put an orange traffic cone out for the opposing team to dribble around. Sorry for the pessimistic look, but maybe if your expectations are low he’ll look better in the uni.

In a second missive, he writes:

One of my commenters, George, made a good point about Cook I’ll pass along:


I think Cook might fare a bit better in Orlando with Howard getting all the attention down low. Originally, he was drafted to play alongside Shaq, so I guess one can draw a comparison in the scenarios.

Also, Cook got a bad rap because he and Vladamir Radmanovic were basically competing for the same role, but Radman has a much more rounded game (he can put the ball on the floor, Cook can’t). I hope this works out for you, I really like the core of the team they are building down there.

Indeed, the Lakers got the better end of the deal, shedding salary while simultaneously bringing in better talent. But lost in all this pessimistic talk from Magic fans' point of view is that Ariza wasn't working in Stan Van Gundy's offense. It's not about having the most raw talent on your team, but rather about having the most talent that fits into the system you're trying to implement. Since Cook and Evans shoot threes well, and since Ariza doesn't, the trade doesn't look too bad. We'll see how it works out.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What strikes me as odd is

why did the Magic feel the need to make this trade at all? Last ime I checked, they're near the top of the NBA standings, and were the first team to stop the Celtics. Trade what?

by Zorgon on Nov 21, 2007 4:19 PM EST reply actions  

Re: What strikes me as odd is

I don't think it's a panicky move as much as it is a minor tweak the team thinks it needs to make to elevate itself.

by Evan Dunlap on Nov 21, 2007 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

New Guys

I'd say one reason to make this trade is to give the bench some offensive punch which Cook and Evans can do. These two seem to possess the skill sets that SVG wants in his rotation. Unfortunately we had to give up on Ariza, which will come back to nip us in the butt I think, but we should be used to that by now, no?

by Eyriq the Red on Nov 21, 2007 4:52 PM EST reply actions  

Re: New Guys

Cook and Evans should be able to provide some scoring, so the trade makes sense from that standpoint. But Cook is a horrible defender, and he has three years left on his deal, so I don't know why we'd bring him in. Was this deal really the best one we could make? Ariza and the exception couldn't get us anything better?

by Evan Dunlap on Nov 21, 2007 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images_small
Post-Game Recap: Magic 109, Wizards 103
Logo2_small
The Dwight Saga
Images_small
Post-Game Recap: 76ers 74, Magic 69

Recent FanPosts

Small
Dwight Howard and scoring volatility
Small
VOTE!!: Rondo, JO, Allen, 2 picks for D12 & Nelson
Aazpkmicmaanray_jpg_large_small
Poll: Who has the worse contract?
Small
Oh Jameer, Jameer, where hast thou gone?
Images_small
Nelson for Calderon?
Dwight-howard-globetrotters_small
Stupid Dwight Howard Trade Posts
Small
Fran Vazquez will likely play in the NBA next year.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Contact Us

General Twitter feed

Evan Dunlap, Managing Editor / Press Contact

Tiny Blogroll

Rather than include our complete blogroll in this space, we've decided to link to it instead. That way, you won't have to do as much scrolling. Enjoy.


Managing Editor

Minimalistchalksquare_small Evan Dunlap

Contributing Writer

Images_small Mike from Illinois